Schrli v. Jackson & Hertogs LLP et al
Plaintiff: Ms. Brooke Schrli
Defendant: Jackson & Hertogs LLP and Ilana Drummond
Case Number: 3:2019cv01218
Filed: March 6, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Presiding Judge: Thomas S Hixson
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 26, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 4, 2019 Filing 7 Certificate of Interested Entities by Brooke Schrli (Gabel, Mark) (Filed on 4/4/2019)
March 22, 2019 Filing 6 Summons Issued as to Jackson & Hertogs LLP. (hdjS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/22/2019)
March 21, 2019 Filing 5 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Brooke Schrli.. (Gabel, Mark) (Filed on 3/21/2019)
March 21, 2019 Filing 4 Proposed Summons. (Gabel, Mark) (Filed on 3/21/2019)
March 8, 2019 Filing 3 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: This case may fall within the Pilot Program for Initial Discovery Protocols for Employment Cases Alleging Adverse Action. See #General Order 71. Parties and Counsel are directed to review General Order 71 to determine whether it applies to this case, and to comply with that General Order if applicable. Case Management Statement due by 5/ 30/2019. Initial Case Management Conference set for 6/6/2019 10:00 AM. (hdjS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/8/2019)
March 8, 2019 Filing 2 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Thomas S. Hixson. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 3/22/2019. (haS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/8/2019)
March 7, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT Brooke Scharli against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0971-13152251.). Filed byBrooke Schrli. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Gabel, Mark) (Filed on 3/7/2019)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Schrli v. Jackson & Hertogs LLP et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jackson & Hertogs LLP
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ilana Drummond
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Ms. Brooke Schrli
Represented By: Mark C. Gabel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?