Alvarado Tello v. Barr et al
| Fredy Porfirio Alvarado Tello |
| Ronald D. Vitiello, William Barr, Kirstjen Nielson and Erik Bonnar |
| 3:2019cv01312 |
| March 12, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Charles R Breyer |
| Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 20, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
ORDER by Judge Charles R. Breyer granting #3 Motion for TRO. (crblc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/12/2019)
|
| Filing 8 Summons Issued as to William Barr, Erik Bonnar, Kirstjen Nielson, Ronald D. Vitiello. (mclS, COURT STAFF) |
|
Filing 7
ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned to Judge Charles R. Breyer for all further proceedings. Magistrate Judge Kandis A. Westmore no longer assigned to the case. This case is assigned to a judge who participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras. Signed by Clerk on 3/12/2019. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Eligibility for Video Recording)(jmlS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/12/2019)
|
| Filing 6 CLERK'S NOTICE of Impending Reassignment to U.S. District Judge. (ivaS, COURTSTAFF) (Filed on 3/12/2019) |
| Filing 5 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Kandis A. Westmore. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 3/26/2019. (jmlS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/12/2019) |
| Filing 4 EXHIBITS re #3 Emergency MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order Enjoining the Respondents from Detaining the Petitioner Exhibit 11: Letters of Support filed byFredy Porfirio Alvarado Tello. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exh. 11 Letters of Support)(Related document(s) #3 ) (Schouten, Nienke) (Filed on 3/12/2019) |
| Filing 3 Emergency MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order Enjoining the Respondents from Detaining the Petitioner filed by Fredy Porfirio Alvarado Tello. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit USC BC, #2 Exhibit NTA, #3 Exhibit Employment Letter, #4 Exhibit Criminal Docket, #5 Exhibit Klutz, #6 Exhibit I-130 Receipt, #7 Exhibit IJ Bond Determination, #8 Exhibit Rehabilitation Acceptance, #9 Exhibit Rehabilitation Completion and Awards, #10 Exhibit BIA Decision)(Schouten, Nienke) (Filed on 3/12/2019) |
| Filing 2 Proposed Summons. (Schouten, Nienke) (Filed on 3/12/2019) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus ( Filing fee $ 5.00 receipt number 0971-13162471.). Filed byFredy Porfirio Alvarado Tello. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit USC BC, #2 Exhibit NTA, #3 Exhibit Employment Letter, #4 Exhibit Criminal Docket, #5 Exhibit Klutz, #6 Exhibit I-130 Receipt, #7 Exhibit IJ Bond Determination, #8 Exhibit Rehabilitation Acceptance Letter, #9 Exhibit Rehabilitation Completion Letter and Awards, #10 Exhibit BIA Decision, #11 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet)(Schouten, Nienke) (Filed on 3/12/2019) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
