Locatelli v. Saul
Plaintiff: Marysarah Locatelli
Defendant: Nancy A. Berryhill and Andrew M. Saul
Case Number: 3:2019cv01409
Filed: March 18, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Presiding Judge: Thomas S Hixson
Nature of Suit: Social Security: DIWC/DIWW
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 18, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 7, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER FOR PARTIES TO MEET AND CONFER RE: STATEMENT OF ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD. Signed by Judge Thomas S. Hixson on 5/7/2019. (tshlc2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/7/2019)
May 6, 2019 Filing 10 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Nancy A. Berryhill.. (Chen, Carolyn) (Filed on 5/6/2019)
April 30, 2019 Filing 9 SUMMONS Returned Executed in a Social Security Case Nancy A. Berryhill served on 4/29/2019, answer due 7/29/2019. (hdjS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/30/2019)
April 2, 2019 Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed in a Social Security Case Nancy A. Berryhill served on 3/28/2019, answer due 6/26/2019. (hdjS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/2/2019)
April 2, 2019 Filing 7 NOTICE of Acknowledgment of Receipt re #5 Summons Issued as to USA (hdjS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/2/2019)
March 26, 2019 Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Nancy A. Berryhill, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (hdjS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/26/2019) (Additional attachment(s) added on 3/26/2019: #1 usm) (hdjS, COURT STAFF).
March 25, 2019 Filing 6 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Marysarah Locatelli. (hdjS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/25/2019) (Additional attachment(s) added on 3/26/2019: #1 Envelope) (hdjS, COURT STAFF).
March 22, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER by Judge Thomas S. Hixson granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. (tshlc2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/22/2019)
March 18, 2019 Filing 3 SOCIAL SECURITY PROCEDURAL ORDER: (bwS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/18/2019)
March 18, 2019 Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Marysarah Locatelli. (bwS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/18/2019)
March 18, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Judicial Review of Decision of Commissioner of Social Security against Nancy A. Berryhill No Process. IFPP . Filed by Marysarah Locatelli. Consent/Declination due by 4/1/2019. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(bwS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/18/2019)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Locatelli v. Saul
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Marysarah Locatelli
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Nancy A. Berryhill
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Andrew M. Saul
Represented By: Carolyn Beth Chen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?