Divine v. State of California
| Danielle Divine |
| State of California |
| 3:2019cv01537 |
| March 19, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Richard Seeborg |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 16, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
Order by Judge Richard Seeborg adopting in part Report and Recommendations as to #6 . The deputy clerk hereby certifies that on 4/18/19, a copy of this order was served by sending it via first-class mail to the address of each non-CM/ECF user listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing. (mllS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/17/2019)
|
|
Filing 8
ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned to Judge Richard Seeborg for all further proceedings. Magistrate Judge Joseph C. Spero no longer assigned to the case.. Signed by Clerk on 3/26/19. (as, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/26/2019)
|
|
Filing 7
ORDER REASSIGNING CASE.. Signed by Chief Magistrate Judge Joseph C. Spero on 3/26/19. (klhS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/26/2019)
|
| Filing 6 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re #1 Review of Complaint Under 28 USC Section 1915. Objections due by 4/8/2019.. Signed by Judge Joseph C. Spero on March 25, 2019 (jcslc1S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/25/2019) (Additional attachment(s) added on 3/26/2019: #1 Certificate/Proof of Service) (klhS, COURT STAFF). |
| Filing 5 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Case Management Statement due by 6/21/2019. Initial Case Management Conference set for 6/28/2019 02:00 PM in San Francisco, Courtroom G, 15th Floor. (gbaS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/25/2019) (Additional attachment(s) added on 3/25/2019: #1 Certificate/Proof of Service) (gbaS, COURT STAFF). |
|
Filing 4
ORDER FOR CLERK'S OFFICE TO FILE AS A CIVIL CASE. Signed by Judge Joseph C. Spero on March 25, 2019. (jcslc1S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/25/2019) (Additional attachment(s) added on 3/25/2019: #1 Certificate/Proof of Service) (klhS, COURT STAFF).
|
|
Filing 3
ORDER by Judge Joseph C. Spero granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. (jcslc1S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/21/2019) (Additional attachment(s) added on 3/22/2019: #1 Certificate/Proof of Service) (klhS, COURT STAFF).
|
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Danielle Divine. (ajsS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/19/2019) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against State of California. Filed byDanielle Divine. Consent/Declination due by 4/3/2019. (ajsS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/19/2019) Modified on 3/20/2019 (ajsS, COURT STAFF). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Divine v. State of California | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: State of California | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Danielle Divine | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
