Wescott v. Upshaw et al
Plaintiff: Carl Alexander Wescott
Defendant: Jim Upshaw, Upshaw Performance Systems, Chris Patterson and HPA Mortgage, LLC
Case Number: 3:2019cv01640
Filed: March 28, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Presiding Judge: William H Orrick
Referring Judge: Kandis A Westmore
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 19, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 13, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned using a proportionate, random, and blind system pursuant to General Order No. 44 to Judge William H. Orrick for all further proceedings. Magistrate Judge Kandis A. Westmore no longer assigned to case, Notice: The assigned judge participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order No. 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras. Signed by the Clerk on 06/13/2019. (Attachments: #1 Certificate/Proof of Service, #2 Notice of Eligibility for Video Recording)(ajsS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/13/2019)
June 12, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER REASSIGNING CASE to a District Judge; REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction. Objections due by 7/1/2019. Signed by Judge Kandis A. Westmore on 6/12/2019. (kawlc2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/12/2019) (Additional attachment(s) added on 6/12/2019: #1 Certificate/Proof of Service) (ivaS, COURTSTAFF).
June 4, 2019 Filing 10 Verified Second COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against Chris Patterson, Jim Upshaw, Upshaw Performance Systems, HPA Mortgage, LLC. Filed byCarl Alexander Wescott. (jmlS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/4/2019) Modified on 6/6/2019 (jlmS, COURT STAFF).
May 17, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER by Judge Kandis A. Westmore Granting #3 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; Screening Order Reviewing Plaintiff's Complaint. (kawlc2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/17/2019) (Additional attachment(s) added on 5/20/2019: #1 Certificate/Proof of Service) (ivaS, COURTSTAFF).
May 1, 2019 Filing 8 Mail sent to Carl Alexander Wescott returned as undeliverable re #5 Clerk's Notice re: Consent or Declination,. (jmlS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/1/2019)
April 22, 2019 Filing 7 Verification for Complaint for Breach of Contract and Other Causes of Action by Carl Alexander Wescott re #1 Complaint (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(jmlS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/22/2019)
April 22, 2019 Filing 6 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Carl Alexander Wescott (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(jmlS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/22/2019)
April 12, 2019 Filing 5 CLERK'S NOTICE Re: Consent or Declination (Certificate of Service attached): Plaintiff shall file a consent or declination to proceed before a magistrate judge. Note that any party is free to withhold consent to proceed before a magistrate judge without adverse substantive consequences. The forms are available at: http://cand.uscourts.gov/civilforms. Consent/Declination due by 4/26/2019. (ivaS, COURTSTAFF) (Filed on 4/12/2019)
April 2, 2019 Filing 4 CLERK'S NOTICE of Resources Available to Pro Se Litigants. (Attachments: #1 Certificate/Proof of Service) (jmlS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/2/2019)
March 28, 2019 Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Carl Alexander Wescott. (rcsS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/28/2019)
March 28, 2019 Filing 2 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Case Management Statement due by 7/2/2019. Initial Case Management Conference set for 7/9/2019 01:30 PM at the Ronald Dellums Federal Building, 1301 Clay Street, Oakland, CA. (rcsS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/28/2019)
March 28, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Chris Patterson, Jim Upshaw, Upshaw Performance Systems. Filed by Carl Alexander Wescott. Consent/Declination due by 4/11/2019. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(rcsS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/28/2019)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Wescott v. Upshaw et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jim Upshaw
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Upshaw Performance Systems
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Chris Patterson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: HPA Mortgage, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Carl Alexander Wescott
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?