Sawyer III v. San Francisco Bay Area Properties II, LLC
Plaintiff: Oziel Sawyer III
Defendant: San Francisco Bay Area Properties II, LLC
Case Number: 3:2019cv01864
Filed: April 8, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Presiding Judge: Joseph C Spero
Nature of Suit: American with Disabilities - Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101
Jury Demanded By: Defendant
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 18, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 24, 2019 Filing 13 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by San Francisco Bay Area Properties II, LLC.. (Preonas, Stephen) (Filed on 6/24/2019)
June 24, 2019 Filing 12 CLERK'S NOTICE Re: Consent or Declination: Plaintiff shall file a consent or declination to proceed before a magistrate judge. Note that any party is free to withhold consent to proceed before a magistrate judge without adverse substantive consequences. The forms are available at: http://cand.uscourts.gov/civilforms. (Party/parties were also notified via telephone or email.) Consent/Declination due by 7/8/2019. (klhS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/24/2019)
June 24, 2019 Filing 11 CLERK'S THIRD NOTICE Re: Consent or Declination: Defendant SF Bay Area Properties shall file a consent or declination to proceed before a magistrate judge. Note that any party is free to withhold consent to proceed before a magistrate judge without adverse substantive consequences. The forms are available at: http://cand.uscourts.gov/civilforms. (Party/parties were also notified via telephone or email.) Consent/Declination due by 7/8/2019. (klhS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/24/2019)
June 4, 2019 Filing 10 CLERK'S SECOND NOTICE Re: Consent or Declination: Defendant San Francisco Bay Area Properties shall file a consent or declination to proceed before a magistrate judge. Note that any party is free to withhold consent to proceed before a magistrate judge without adverse substantive consequences. The forms are available at: http://cand.uscourts.gov/civilforms. (Party/parties were also notified via telephone or email.) Consent/Declination due by 6/18/2019. (klhS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/4/2019)
May 16, 2019 Filing 9 CLERK'S NOTICE Re: Consent or Declination: Defendant SF Bay Area Properties shall file a consent or declination to proceed before a magistrate judge. Note that any party is free to withhold consent to proceed before a magistrate judge without adverse substantive consequences. The forms are available at: http://cand.uscourts.gov/civilforms. (Party/parties were also notified via telephone or email.) Consent/Declination due by 5/30/2019. (klhS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/16/2019)
May 15, 2019 Filing 8 ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand bySan Francisco Bay Area Properties II, LLC. (Preonas, Stephen) (Filed on 5/15/2019)
April 10, 2019 Filing 7 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Oziel Sawyer III.. (Attachments: #1 Certificate/Proof of Service)(Seabock, Amanda) (Filed on 4/10/2019)
April 9, 2019 Filing 6 Summons Issued as to San Francisco Bay Area Properties II, LLC. (gbaS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/9/2019)
April 9, 2019 Filing 5 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order for Cases Asserting Denial of Right of Access under Americans with Disabilities Act. (gbaS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/9/2019)
April 8, 2019 Filing 4 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Joseph C. Spero. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 4/22/2019. (bwS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/8/2019)
April 8, 2019 Filing 3 Proposed Summons. (Seabock, Amanda) (Filed on 4/8/2019)
April 8, 2019 Filing 2 Certificate of Interested Entities by Oziel Sawyer III re #1 Complaint, (Seabock, Amanda) (Filed on 4/8/2019)
April 8, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Damages and Injunctive Relief for Violations of: Americans with Disabilities Act; Unruh Civil Rights Act against San Francisco Bay Area Properties II, LLC (Filing fee $ 400.00, receipt number 0971-13238821.). Filed by Oziel Sawyer III. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Seabock, Amanda) (Filed on 4/8/2019) Modified on 4/9/2019 (gbaS, COURT STAFF).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Sawyer III v. San Francisco Bay Area Properties II, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: San Francisco Bay Area Properties II, LLC
Represented By: Stephen George Preonas
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Oziel Sawyer III
Represented By: Amanda Lockhart Seabock
Represented By: Chris Carson
Represented By: Dennis Jay Price, II
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?