GTE Mobilnet of California Limited Partnership v. Town of Danville
GTE Mobilnet of California Limited Partnership and GTE Mobilnet of California Limited Partnership doing business as Verizon Wireless |
Town of Danville |
3:2019cv01886 |
April 8, 2019 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
Elizabeth D Laporte |
Other Statutory Actions |
28 U.S.C. § 1331 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 14, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 21 REPLY (re #11 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Seventh Count ) filed byTown of Danville. (Steiner, Harriet) (Filed on 7/3/2019) |
Filing 20 ORDER to Continue Case Management Conference and Set Case Management Deadlines signed by Magistrate Judge Elizabeth D. Laporte: granting #16 Stipulation. (shyS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/2/2019) |
Filing 19 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Town of Danville.. (Steiner, Harriet) (Filed on 7/2/2019) |
Filing 18 CLERK'S NOTICE: Courtroom Deputy advised defense by phone that Defendant's consent/declination to proceed before the magistrate judge is past due and that consent/declination should be filed as soon as possible. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (shyS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/1/2019) |
Filing 17 OPPOSITION/RESPONSE (re #11 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Seventh Count ) filed byGTE Mobilnet of California Limited Partnership. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Denying Motion to Dismiss)(Heard, James) (Filed on 6/28/2019) |
Filing 16 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER to Continue CMC & Set Case Mgmt. Deadlines filed by GTE Mobilnet of California Limited Partnership. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order to Continue CMC & Set Case Mgmt. Deadlines)(Heard, James) (Filed on 6/27/2019) |
Filing 15 JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT & Rule 26 Report filed by GTE Mobilnet of California Limited Partnership. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exh. A - Proposed Deadlines, #2 Exhibit Exh. B - Cert. of Interested Parties)(Heard, James) (Filed on 6/20/2019) |
Filing 14 ADR Certification (ADR L.R. 3-5 b) of discussion of ADR options (Steiner, Harriet) (Filed on 6/18/2019) |
Filing 13 ADR Certification (ADR L.R. 3-5 b) of discussion of ADR options (Heard, James) (Filed on 6/18/2019) |
Filing 12 Proposed Order re #11 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Seventh Count by Town of Danville. (Steiner, Harriet) (Filed on 6/17/2019) |
Filing 11 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Seventh Count filed by Town of Danville. Motion Hearing set for 7/30/2019 09:00 AM in San Francisco, Courtroom E, 15th Floor before Magistrate Judge Elizabeth D. Laporte. Responses due by 6/28/2019. Replies due by 7/5/2019. (Attachments: #1Erroneously E-filed: Please See Docket Number #12 for Correction Proposed Order [Proposed] Order)(Steiner, Harriet) (Filed on 6/14/2019) Modified on 6/17/2019 (aaaS, COURT STAFF). |
Filing 10 NOTICE of Appearance by Joanna M Gin (Gin, Joanna) (Filed on 6/13/2019) |
Filing 9 STIPULATION to Extend Time to Respond to Complaint filed by Town of Danville. (Steiner, Harriet) (Filed on 6/6/2019) |
Filing 8 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by GTE Mobilnet of California Limited Partnership.. (Heard, James) (Filed on 4/22/2019) |
Filing 7 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed filed by GTE Mobilnet of California Limited Partnership. Service waived by Town of Danville waiver sent on 4/9/2019, answer due 6/10/2019. (Heard, James) (Filed on 4/19/2019) |
Filing 6 Summons Issued as to Town of Danville. (aaaS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/9/2019) |
Filing 5 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Case Management Statement due by 7/2/2019. Initial Case Management Conference set for 7/9/2019 10:00 AM. Signed by Magistrate Judge Elizabeth D. Laporte on 4/8/19. (aaaS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/8/2019) |
Filing 4 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Elizabeth D. Laporte. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 4/22/2019. (srnS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/8/2019) |
Filing 3 Proposed Summons. (Heard, James) (Filed on 4/8/2019) |
Filing 2 Certificate of Interested Entities by GTE Mobilnet of California Limited Partnership identifying Other Affiliate Cellco Partnership, Other Affiliate Verizon Communications, Inc., Other Affiliate MCI Communications Services, Inc., Other Affiliate Bell Atlantic Mobile Systems LLC, Other Affiliate Southwestco Wireless, Inc., Other Affiliate PG&E Corporation for GTE Mobilnet of California Limited Partnership. (Heard, James) (Filed on 4/8/2019) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY JUDGMENT AND INJUNCTION; REQUEST FOR EXPEDITED REVIEW UNDER 47 U.S.C. 332(c)(7)(B)(v); against Town of Danville ( Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0971-13241550.). Filed byGTE Mobilnet of California Limited Partnership. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Heard, James) (Filed on 4/8/2019) Modified on 4/9/2019 (aaaS, COURT STAFF). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.