Autodistributors, Inc. v. Sixt Franchise USA, LLC et al
| Autodistributors, Inc., a Nevada Corporation registered in California and Autodistributors, Inc. |
| Sixt Franchise USA, LLC and Sixt Rent a Car LLC |
| 3:2019cv01963 |
| April 11, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| William H Orrick |
| Franchise |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1330 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 23, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 23
ORDER OF DISMISSAL. Signed by Judge William H. Orrick on 05/23/2019. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/23/2019)
|
| Filing 22 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Autodistributors, Inc. (Jackson, Larry) (Filed on 5/17/2019) |
|
Filing 21
CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE ORDER - Case Management Conference set for 8/20/2019 02:00 PM in San Francisco, Courtroom 02, 17th Floor. Case Management Statement due by 8/13/2019. Signed by Judge William H. Orrick on 05/16/2019. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/16/2019)
|
| Filing 20 CLERK'S NOTICE - Motion Hearing as to #12 MOTION to Stay/Dismiss continued to 6/26/2019 02:00 PM in San Francisco, Courtroom 02, 17th Floor before Judge William H. Orrick. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/16/2019) |
| Filing 19 CLERK'S NOTICE - Motion Hearing reset for 6/12/2019 02:00 PM in San Francisco, Courtroom 02, 17th Floor before Judge William H. Orrick as to #12 MOTION TO STAY PROCEEDINGS OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, MOTION to Dismiss. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/15/2019) |
|
Filing 18
ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned using a proportionate, random, and blind system pursuant to General Order No. 44 to Judge William H. Orrick for all further proceedings. Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu no longer assigned to case, Notice: The assigned judge participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order No. 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras. Signed by the Clerk on 05/08/2019. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Eligibility for Video Recording)(ajsS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/8/2019)
|
| Filing 17 CLERK'S NOTICE OF IMPENDING REASSIGNMENT TO A U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE: The Clerk of this Court will now randomly reassign this case to a District Judge because either (1) a party has not consented to the jurisdiction of a Magistrate Judge, or (2) time is of the essence in deciding a pending judicial action for which the necessary consents to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction have not been secured. You will be informed by separate notice of the district judge to whom this case is reassigned. ALL HEARING DATES PRESENTLY SCHEDULED BEFORE THE CURRENT MAGISTRATE JUDGE ARE VACATED AND SHOULD BE RE-NOTICED FOR HEARING BEFORE THE JUDGE TO WHOM THIS CASE IS REASSIGNED. This is a text only docket entry; there is no document associated with this notice. (ig, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/8/2019) |
| Filing 16 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Sixt Franchise USA, LLC, Sixt Rent a Car LLC.. (Friedenberg, Adam) (Filed on 5/8/2019) |
| Filing 15 NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF OTHER ACTION OR PROCEEDING by Sixt Franchise USA, LLC, Sixt Rent a Car LLC (Friedenberg, Adam) (Filed on 5/8/2019) Modified on 5/8/2019 (ajsS, COURT STAFF). |
| Filing 14 CLERK'S NOTICE TO PLAINTIFF AND DEFENDANTS Re: Consent or Declination: Plaintiff and Defendants shall file a consent or declination to proceed before a magistrate judge. Note that any party is free to withhold consent to proceed before a magistrate judge without adverse substantive consequences. The forms are available at: http://cand.uscourts.gov/civilforms. Consent/Declination due by 5/14/2019. (ig, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/7/2019) |
| Filing 13 Request for Judicial Notice re #12 MOTION to Stay PROCEEDINGS OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, MOTION to Dismiss PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT AND SUPPORTING MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES filed bySixt Franchise USA, LLC, Sixt Rent a Car LLC. (Related document(s) #12 ) (Friedenberg, Adam) (Filed on 5/7/2019) |
| Filing 12 MOTION to Stay PROCEEDINGS OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE,, MOTION to Dismiss PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT AND SUPPORTING MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES filed by Sixt Franchise USA, LLC, Sixt Rent a Car LLC. Motion Hearing set for 6/13/2019 11:00 AM in Oakland, Courtroom 4, 3rd Floor before Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu. Responses due by 5/21/2019. Replies due by 5/28/2019. (Friedenberg, Adam) (Filed on 5/7/2019) |
| Filing 11 ***INCORRECT EVENT USED, SEE DKT. #15 *** NOTICE of Pendency of Other Action or Proceeding by Sixt Franchise USA, LLC, Sixt Rent a Car LLC (Friedenberg, Adam) (Filed on 5/7/2019) Modified on 5/8/2019 (ajsS, COURT STAFF).. |
|
Filing 10
ORDER by Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu granting #8 Aaron S. Blynn's Motion for admission Pro Hac Vice. (ig, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/6/2019)
|
|
Filing 9
ORDER by Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu granting #7 Michael D. Joblove's Motion for admission Pro Hac Vice. (ig, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/6/2019)
|
| Filing 8 MOTION for leave to appear in Pro Hac Vice re: Aaron S. Blynn ( Filing fee $ 310, receipt number 0971-13316146.) filed by Sixt Franchise USA, LLC. (Blynn, Aaron) (Filed on 5/3/2019) Modified on 5/6/2019 (ajsS, COURT STAFF). |
| Filing 7 MOTION for leave to appear in Pro Hac Vice re: Michael D. Joblove ( Filing fee $ 310, receipt number 0971-13315879.) filed by Sixt Franchise USA, LLC. (Joblove, Michael) (Filed on 5/3/2019) Modified on 5/3/2019 (ajsS, COURT STAFF). |
| Filing 6 CLERK'S NOTICE TO PLAINTIFF Re: Consent or Declination: Plaintiff shall file a consent or declination to proceed before a magistrate judge. Note that any party is free to withhold consent to proceed before a magistrate judge without adverse substantive consequences. The forms are available at: http://cand.uscourts.gov/civilforms. Consent/Declination due by 5/13/2019. (ig, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/29/2019) |
| Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Sixt Franchise USA, LLC, Sixt Rent a Car LLC. (ajsS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/12/2019) |
| Filing 4 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Case Management Statement due by 7/24/2019. Initial Case Management Conference set for 7/31/2019 01:30 PM in Oakland, Courtroom 4, 3rd Floor. (ajsS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/12/2019) |
| Filing 3 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 4/25/2019. (bwS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/11/2019) |
| Filing 2 Proposed Summons. (Boesch, Philip) (Filed on 4/11/2019) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0971-13253997.). Filed by Autodistributors, Inc., a Nevada Corporation registered in California. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-C, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Boesch, Philip) (Filed on 4/11/2019) Modified on 4/12/2019 (ajsS, COURT STAFF). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
