Rattagan v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al
Plaintiff: Michael R. Rattagan
Defendant: Uber International Holdings, BV, Uber International, BV and Uber Technologies, Inc.
Case Number: 3:2019cv01988
Filed: April 12, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Presiding Judge: Edward M Chen
Referring Judge: Kandis A Westmore
Nature of Suit: Other Fraud
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
RSS RSS Track this Docket
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 6, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 6, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 82 ORDER CERTIFYING QUESTION TO THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA by USCA as to #79 Notice of Appeal to the Ninth Circuit filed by Michael R. Rattagan (msr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/6/2021)
October 16, 2020 Filing 81 Transcript Designation Form for proceedings held on 08/08/2019, 08/13/2020 before Judge Edward M. Chen, re #79 Notice of Appeal Transcript due by 11/16/2020. (Cohoe, Jill) (Filed on 10/16/2020)
September 21, 2020 Filing 80 USCA Case Number 20-16796 9th Circuit for #79 Notice of Appeal filed by Michael R. Rattagan. (hdjS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/21/2020)
September 16, 2020 Filing 79 NOTICE OF APPEAL to the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals filed by Michael R. Rattagan. (Appeal fee of $505 receipt number 0971-14948856 paid.) (Steyer, Allan) (Filed on 9/16/2020)
August 23, 2020 Filing 78 Transcript of Proceedings held on 8/13/20, before Judge Edward M. Chen. Court Reporter Jo Ann Bryce, telephone number 510-910-5888, email: joann_bryce@cand.uscourts.gov. Per General Order No. 59 and Judicial Conference policy, this transcript may be viewed only at the Clerk's Office public terminal or may be purchased through the Court Reporter until the deadline for the Release of Transcript Restriction after 90 days. After that date, it may be obtained through PACER. Any Notice of Intent to Request Redaction, if required, is due no later than 5 business days from date of this filing. (Re #73 Transcript Order ) Release of Transcript Restriction set for 11/23/2020. (Related documents(s) #73 ) (jabS, COURTSTAFF) (Filed on 8/23/2020)
August 19, 2020 Filing 77 JUDGMENT. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 8/19/2020. (emcsec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/19/2020)
August 19, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 76 ORDER by Judge Edward M. Chen Granting #67 Defendant's Motion to Dismiss and Dismissing Case With Prejudice. (emcsec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/19/2020)
August 17, 2020 Filing 75 TRANSCRIPT ORDER for proceedings held on 8/13/2020 before Judge Edward M. Chen by Uber Technologies, Inc., for Court Reporter Jo Ann Bryce. (Heath, Amy) (Filed on 8/17/2020)
August 14, 2020 Filing 73 TRANSCRIPT ORDER for proceedings held on 08/13/2020 before Judge Edward M. Chen by Michael R. Rattagan, for Court Reporter Jo Ann Bryce. (August, Andrew) (Filed on 8/14/2020)
August 13, 2020 Filing 74 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Edward M. Chen: Motion Hearing held on 8/13/2020 re #67 MOTION to Dismiss Third Amended Complaint filed by Uber Technologies, Inc. ; taking under submission #67 Motion to Dismiss. Total Time in Court: 56 Minutes. Court Reporter: JoAnn Bryce. Plaintiff Attorneys: Andrew August, Allan Steyer. Defendant Attorney: Jeff Davidson. Attachment: Minute Order. (afmS, COURT STAFF) (Date Filed: 8/13/2020)
August 11, 2020 Filing 72 CLERKS NOTICE CONVERTING MOTION HEARING #67 MOTION TO DISMISS TO ZOOM HEARING. Motion Hearing set for 8/13/2020 01:30 PM in San Francisco before Judge Edward M. Chen. For Zoom connection, see: https://apps.cand.uscourts.gov/telhrg/This proceeding will be a Zoom video conferencing webinar. PLEASE NOTE: Persons granted access to court proceedings held by telephone or videoconference are reminded that photographing, recording, and rebroadcasting of court proceedings, including screenshots or other visual copying of a hearing, is absolutely prohibited. See General Order 58 at Paragraph III.Case participants will enter proceeding as attendees, thereafter promoted to panelists and shall arrive at least 5 minutes prior to hearing start time.All counsel, members of the public and press please click the link or use the information below to join the webinar: https://cand-uscourts.zoomgov.com/j/1619911861?pwd=TjVma1lnMlJlNHR3ZE9QMkFjNkFndz09Meeting ID: 161 991 1861Password: 912881Dial by your location+1 929 205 6099 US (New York)+1 253 215 8782 US+1 301 715 8592 US+1 312 626 6799 US (Chicago)+1 346 248 7799 US (Houston)+1 669 900 6833 US (San Jose)Find your local number: https://zoom.us/u/ac4JkPfcjoFor important information and guidance on technical preparation, please see #https://www.cand.uscourts.gov/zoom/. as to #67 MOTION to Dismiss Third Amended Complaint. Motion Hearing set for 8/13/2020 01:30 PM in San Francisco before Judge Edward M. Chen. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (afmS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/11/2020)
July 30, 2020 Filing 71 REPLY (re #67 MOTION to Dismiss Third Amended Complaint ) filed byUber Technologies, Inc.. (Shin, Clara) (Filed on 7/30/2020)
July 20, 2020 Filing 70 OPPOSITION/RESPONSE (re #67 MOTION to Dismiss Third Amended Complaint ) - Plaintiff's Opposition to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Third Amended Complaint filed byMichael R. Rattagan. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Andrew A. August in Support of Plaintiff's Opposition to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Third Amended Complaint, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit C, #5 Exhibit D)(August, Andrew) (Filed on 7/20/2020)
July 2, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 69 Order by Judge Edward M. Chen granting #68 Stipulation Regarding Case Schedule re: #67 Motion to Dismiss. Opposition due 7/20/2020; reply due 7/30/2020; hearing reset for 8/13/2020 at 1:30 PM. before Judge Edward M. Chen.(afmS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/2/2020)
July 2, 2020 Filing 68 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER re #67 MOTION to Dismiss Third Amended Complaint - Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Regarding Case Schedule filed by Michael R. Rattagan. (August, Andrew) (Filed on 7/2/2020)
July 2, 2020 Set/Reset Deadlines as to #67 MOTION to Dismiss Third Amended Complaint. Responses due by 7/20/2020. Replies due by 7/30/2020. Motion Hearing set for 8/13/2020 01:30 PM in San Francisco before Judge Edward M. Chen. (afmS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/2/2020)
June 19, 2020 Filing 67 MOTION to Dismiss Third Amended Complaint filed by Uber Technologies, Inc.. Motion Hearing set for 7/30/2020 01:30 PM in San Francisco, Courtroom 05, 17th Floor before Judge Edward M. Chen. Responses due by 7/6/2020. Replies due by 7/13/2020. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Shin, Clara) (Filed on 6/19/2020)
May 12, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 66 Order by Judge Edward M. Chen granting #65 Stipulation to Extend Deadline to Respond to Third Amended Complaint. Answer due 6/19/2020.(afmS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/12/2020)
May 11, 2020 Filing 65 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER TO EXTEND DEADLINE TO RESPOND TO THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT filed by Uber Technologies, Inc.. (Shin, Clara) (Filed on 5/11/2020)
May 6, 2020 Filing 64 AMENDED COMPLAINT Third Amended Complaint against Uber Technologies, Inc.. Filed byMichael R. Rattagan. (August, Andrew) (Filed on 5/6/2020)
May 5, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 63 Order by Judge Edward M. Chen granting #58 Motion for Leave to File Third Amended Complaint.(afmS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/5/2020)
April 27, 2020 Filing 62 REPLY (re #58 MOTION for Leave to File Third Amended Complaint ) - Plaintiffs Reply to Defendants Statement in Response to Motion for Leave to File Third Amended Complaint filed byMichael R. Rattagan. (August, Andrew) (Filed on 4/27/2020)
April 23, 2020 Filing 61 OPPOSITION/RESPONSE (re #58 MOTION for Leave to File Third Amended Complaint ) filed byUber Technologies, Inc.. (Shin, Clara) (Filed on 4/23/2020)
April 2, 2020 Filing 60 Proposed Order re #58 MOTION for Leave to File Third Amended Complaint by Michael R. Rattagan. (August, Andrew) (Filed on 4/2/2020)
April 2, 2020 Filing 59 CLERK'S NOTICE: Any response/opposition to Docket No. #58 is due by April 23, 2020. Any such response is limited to 5 pages. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (afmS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/2/2020)
April 2, 2020 Filing 58 MOTION for Leave to File Third Amended Complaint filed by Michael R. Rattagan. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Andrew A. August in Support of Motion for Leave to File Third Amended Complaint, #2 Exhibit A - [Proposed] Third Amended Complaint)(August, Andrew) (Filed on 4/2/2020)
March 19, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 57 Order by Judge Edward M. Chen granting #56 Stipulation. Plaintiff shall file the Motion for Leave to Amend ("Motion") by April 2, 2020; Defendant shall file its Opposition to the Motion by May 12, 2020; Plaintiff shall file its Reply on or before May 21, 2020; The hearing, if any, shall be held on a date to be set by the court at its convenience; Uber Technologies shall not be required to respond to Plaintiffs Second Amended Complaint until after the Court rules on the Motion, if necessary.(afmS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/19/2020)
March 19, 2020 Filing 56 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER REGARDING CASE SCHEDULE filed by Michael R. Rattagan. (August, Andrew) (Filed on 3/19/2020)
February 23, 2020 Set/Reset Deadlines as to Responses due by 4/28/2020. Replies due by 5/7/2020. Motion Hearing set for 5/21/2020 01:30 PM in San Francisco, Courtroom 05, 17th Floor before Judge Edward M. Chen. (afmS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/23/2020)
February 21, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 55 Order by Judge Edward M. Chen granting #54 Stipulation. Motion for Leave to File Third Amending Complaint due 3/19/2020; opposition due 4/28/2020; reply due 5/7/2020; hearing set 5/21/2020 at 1:30 p.m.(afmS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/21/2020)
February 20, 2020 Filing 54 STIPULATION - Further Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Regarding Case Schedule filed by Michael R. Rattagan. (August, Andrew) (Filed on 2/20/2020) Modified on 2/23/2020 (afmS, COURT STAFF).
February 18, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 53 Order as Modified by Judge Edward M. Chen granting #52 Stipulation Regarding Case Schedule. Motion filed by 3/2/2020; opposition due 3/31/2020; reply due 4/13/2020; hearing set for 4/23/2020 at 1:30 P.M.(afmS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/18/2020)
February 18, 2020 Set/Reset Deadlines as to: Responses due by 3/31/2020. Replies due by 4/13/2020. Motion Hearing for leave to file third amended complaint set for 4/23/2020 01:30 PM in San Francisco, Courtroom 05, 17th Floor before Judge Edward M. Chen. (afmS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/18/2020)
February 13, 2020 Filing 52 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER filed by Michael R. Rattagan. (August, Andrew) (Filed on 2/13/2020)
January 21, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 51 Order by Judge Edward M. Chen granting #46 Motion to Withdraw as Attorney. (afmS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/21/2020)
January 8, 2020 Filing 50 NOTICE of Appearance by Allan Steyer on Behalf of Plaintiff Michael R. Rattagan (Steyer, Allan) (Filed on 1/8/2020)
January 8, 2020 Filing 49 NOTICE of Appearance by Andrew A. August on Behalf of Plaintiff Michael R. Rattagan (August, Andrew) (Filed on 1/8/2020)
December 19, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 48 Order by Judge Edward M. Chen granting #47 Stipulation. Deadline to response to Uber's Second Amended Complaint is 2/18/2020. Joint Case Management Statement due by 5/21/2020. Initial Case Management Conference set for 3/26/2020 is VACATED and RESCHEDULED for 5/28/2020 09:30 AM in San Francisco, Courtroom 05, 17th Floor.(afmS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/19/2019)
December 18, 2019 Filing 47 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER To Extend All Deadlines And To Continue Case Management Conference filed by Uber Technologies, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Shin, Clara) (Filed on 12/18/2019)
December 18, 2019 Filing 46 MOTION to Withdraw as Attorney (Unopposed) filed by Michael R. Rattagan. Motion Hearing set for 1/16/2020 01:30 PM in San Francisco, Courtroom 05, 17th Floor before Judge Edward M. Chen. Responses due by 1/2/2020. Replies due by 1/9/2020. (Rosenfeld, Stephen) (Filed on 12/18/2019)
November 14, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 45 Order by Judge Edward M. Chen granting #44 Stipulation to Extend Time For Uber Technologies, Inc. to Respond to Second Amended Complaint and to Continue Case Management Conference. Joint Case Management Statement due by 3/19/2020. Initial Case Management Conference set for 3/26/2020 09:30 AM in San Francisco, Courtroom 05, 17th Floor.(afmS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/14/2019)
November 14, 2019 Filing 44 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER to Extend Time for Uber Technologies, Inc. to Respond to Second Amended Complaint and to Continue Case Management Conference filed by Michael R. Rattagan. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Rosenfeld, Stephen) (Filed on 11/14/2019)
October 30, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 43 Order by Judge Edward M. Chen granting #42 Stipulation to Extend For Uber Technologies, Inc. to Respond t Second Amended Complaint and to Continue Case Management Conference. Meet and confer re initial disclosures, early settlement, ADR process selection, and discovery plan due 2/6/2020; ADR Certification signed by parties and counsel due 2/6/2020. Joint Case Management Statement due by 2/20/2020. Initial Case Management Conference set for 2/27/2020 09:30 AM in San Francisco, Courtroom 05, 17th Floor.(afmS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/30/2019)
October 21, 2019 Filing 42 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER to Extend Time for Uber Technologies, Inc. to Respond to Second Amended Complaint and to Continue Case Management Conference filed by Uber Technologies, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Shin, Clara) (Filed on 10/21/2019)
October 2, 2019 Filing 41 TRANSCRIPT ORDER for proceedings held on 8/8/19 before Judge Edward M. Chen by Michael R. Rattagan, for Court Reporter Jo Ann Bryce. (Rosenfeld, Stephen) (Filed on 10/2/2019)
September 26, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 40 Order by Judge Edward M. Chen granting #39 Stipulation to Extend Time For Uber Technologies, Inc. to Respond to Second Amended Complaint and to Continue Case Management Conference. Deadline to meet and confer is 11/21/2019; ADR certification is 11/21/2019; Joint Case Management Statement due by 12/5/2019. Initial Case Management Conference reset for 12/12/2019 09:30 AM in San Francisco, Courtroom 05, 17th Floor.(afmS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/26/2019)
September 24, 2019 Filing 39 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER to Extend Time for Uber Technologies, Inc. to Respond to Second Amended Complaint and to Continue Case Management Conference filed by Uber Technologies, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Shin, Clara) (Filed on 9/24/2019)
September 18, 2019 Filing 38 SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT against Uber Technologies, Inc.. Filed by Michael R. Rattagan. (Rosenfeld, Stephen) (Filed on 9/18/2019)
August 20, 2019 Filing 37 Transcript of Proceedings held on 8/8/19, before Judge Edward M. Chen. Court Reporter Jo Ann Bryce, telephone number 510-910-5888, joann_bryce@cand.uscourts.gov. Per General Order No. 59 and Judicial Conference policy, this transcript may be viewed only at the Clerk's Office public terminal or may be purchased through the Court Reporter until the deadline for the Release of Transcript Restriction after 90 days. After that date, it may be obtained through PACER. Any Notice of Intent to Request Redaction, if required, is due no later than 5 business days from date of this filing. (Re #35 Transcript Order ) Release of Transcript Restriction set for 11/18/2019. (Related documents(s) #35 ) (jabS, COURTSTAFF) (Filed on 8/20/2019)
August 19, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 36 ORDER by Judge Edward M. Chen Granting #27 Defendant's Motion for Sanctions and Dismissing Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint. Amended Complaint due by 9/18/2019. (emcsec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/19/2019)
August 9, 2019 Filing 35 TRANSCRIPT ORDER for proceedings held on 08/08/2019 before Judge Edward M. Chen by Uber Technologies, Inc., for Court Reporter Jo Ann Bryce. (Barnhart, Lindsey) (Filed on 8/9/2019)
August 8, 2019 Filing 34 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Edward M. Chen: Motion Hearing held on 8/8/2019; taking under submission #23 Motion to Dismiss; #27 Motion for Sanctions.Total Time in Court: 47 Minutes. Court Reporter: JoAnn Bryce. Plaintiff Attorney: Steven Rosenfeld. Defendant Attorneys: Clara Shin, Jeff Davidson. Attachment: Minute Order. (afmS, COURT STAFF) (Date Filed: 8/8/2019)
August 8, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 33 Order by Judge Edward M. Chen granting #32 Stipulation to Continue Initial Case Management Conference and Related Deadlines. Joint Case Management Statement due by 10/31/2019. Initial Case Management Conference set for 11/7/2019 09:30 AM in San Francisco, Courtroom 05, 17th Floor. Initial Disclosures, early settlement, ADR process selection, and discovery plan due 10/17/2019; ADR Certification due 10/17/2019; Rule 26(f) Report due 10/31/2019.(afmS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/8/2019)
August 6, 2019 Filing 32 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER to Continue Initial Case Management Conference and Related Deadlines filed by Uber Technologies, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Barnhart, Lindsey) (Filed on 8/6/2019)
July 23, 2019 Filing 31 REPLY in Support (re #27 MOTION for Rule 11 Sanctions) filed by Uber Technologies, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Clara J. Shin in Support of Defendant's Reply in Support of Motion for Rule 11 Sanctions)(Shin, Clara) (Filed on 7/23/2019) Modified on 7/24/2019 (slhS, COURT STAFF).
July 16, 2019 Filing 30 OPPOSITION/RESPONSE (re #27 MOTION for Rule 11 Sanctions ) filed byMichael R. Rattagan. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Stephen J. Rosenfeld, #2 Exhibit A to Rosenfeld Declaration, #3 Exhibit B to Rosenfeld Declaration, #4 Exhibit C to Rosenfeld Declaration)(Rosenfeld, Stephen) (Filed on 7/16/2019)
July 15, 2019 Filing 29 REPLY in Support (re #23 MOTION to Dismiss ) filed by Uber Technologies, Inc.. (Shin, Clara) (Filed on 7/15/2019) Modified on 7/16/2019 (slhS, COURT STAFF).
July 8, 2019 Filing 28 OPPOSITION/RESPONSE (re #23 MOTION to Dismiss ) filed by Michael R. Rattagan. (Rosenfeld, Stephen) (Filed on 7/8/2019)
July 2, 2019 Filing 27 MOTION for Rule 11 Sanctions ; Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support Thereof filed by Uber Technologies, Inc.. Motion Hearing set for 8/8/2019 01:30 PM in San Francisco, Courtroom 05, 17th Floor before Judge Edward M. Chen. Responses due by 7/16/2019. Replies due by 7/23/2019. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Clara J. Shin in Support of Defendant's Motion for Rule 11 Sanctions, #2 Exhibit A to Declaration of Clara J. Shin, #3 Exhibit B to Declaration of Clara J. Shin, #4 Exhibit C to Declaration of Clara J. Shin, #5 Exhibit D to Declaration of Clara J. Shin, #6 Exhibit E to Declaration of Clara J. Shin, #7 Exhibit F to Declaration of Clara J. Shin, #8 Proposed Order)(Shin, Clara) (Filed on 7/2/2019) Modified on 7/3/2019 (slhS, COURT STAFF).
June 27, 2019 Filing 26 NOTICE of Appearance by Amy S. Heath on behalf of Defendant Uber Technologies, Inc. (Heath, Amy) (Filed on 6/27/2019)
June 27, 2019 Filing 25 NOTICE of Appearance by Lindsey Catherine Barnhart on behalf of Defendant Uber Technologies, Inc. (Barnhart, Lindsey) (Filed on 6/27/2019)
June 24, 2019 Filing 24 Request for Judicial Notice re #23 MOTION to Dismiss filed byUber Technologies, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Miguel Lopez Forastier in Support of Uber Technologies' Request for Judicial Notice, #2 Exhibit A to Declaration of Miguel Lopez Forastier, #3 Exhibit B to Declaration of Miguel Lopez Forastier, #4 Exhibit C to Declaration of Miguel Lopez Forastier, #5 Exhibit D to Declaration of Miguel Lopez Forastier)(Related document(s) #23 ) (Shin, Clara) (Filed on 6/24/2019)
June 24, 2019 Filing 23 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Uber Technologies, Inc.. Motion Hearing set for 8/8/2019 01:30 PM in San Francisco, Courtroom 05, 17th Floor before Judge Edward M. Chen. Responses due by 7/8/2019. Replies due by 7/15/2019. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Shin, Clara) (Filed on 6/24/2019)
May 28, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 22 Order by Judge Edward M. Chen granting #19 Stipulation to Extend Time for Defendant Uber Technologies, Inc. to Respond to Amended Complaint. Answer due 6/24/2019.(afmS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/28/2019)
May 23, 2019 Filing 21 Certificate of Interested Entities by Uber Technologies, Inc. identifying Other Affiliate SoftBank Group Corp., Other Affiliate SB Cayman 2 Ltd. for Uber Technologies, Inc.. (Shin, Clara) (Filed on 5/23/2019)
May 23, 2019 Filing 20 NOTICE of Appearance by Jeffrey Michael Davidson (Davidson, Jeffrey) (Filed on 5/23/2019)
May 23, 2019 Filing 19 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER to Extend Time for Defendant Uber Technologies, Inc. to Respond to Amended Complaint filed by Uber Technologies, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Shin, Clara) (Filed on 5/23/2019)
May 23, 2019 Filing 18 NOTICE of Appearance by Clara J. Shin (Shin, Clara) (Filed on 5/23/2019)
May 22, 2019 Filing 17 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Michael R. Rattagan [Cumulative Proofs of Service] (Cialone, Frank) (Filed on 5/22/2019)
May 8, 2019 Filing 16 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Michael R. Rattagan. Uber Technologies, Inc. served on 4/24/2019, answer due 5/15/2019. (Cialone, Frank) (Filed on 5/8/2019)
May 8, 2019 Filing 15 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Uber Technologies, Inc.. Filed byMichael R. Rattagan. (Rosenfeld, Stephen) (Filed on 5/8/2019)
April 25, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 14 CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER IN REASSIGNED CASE: Initial Case Management Conference set for 8/29/2019 09:30 AM in San Francisco, Courtroom 05, 17th Floor. Joint Case Management Statement due by 8/22/2019. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 4/25/2019. (afmS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/25/2019)
April 25, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 13 ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned using a proportionate, random, and blind system pursuant to General Order No. 44 to Judge Edward M. Chen for all further proceedings. Magistrate Judge Kandis A. Westmore no longer assigned to case, Notice: The assigned judge participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order No. 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras. Signed by the Clerk on 04/25/2019. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Eligibility for Video Recording)(ajsS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/25/2019)
April 24, 2019 Filing 12 CLERK'S NOTICE OF IMPENDING REASSIGNMENT TO A U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE: The Clerk of this Court will now randomly reassign this case to a District Judge because either (1) a party has not consented to the jurisdiction of a Magistrate Judge, or (2) time is of the essence in deciding a pending judicial action for which the necessary consents to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction have not been secured. You will be informed by separate notice of the district judge to whom this case is reassigned. ALL HEARING DATES PRESENTLY SCHEDULED BEFORE THE CURRENT MAGISTRATE JUDGE ARE VACATED AND SHOULD BE RE-NOTICED FOR HEARING BEFORE THE JUDGE TO WHOM THIS CASE IS REASSIGNED. This is a text only docket entry; there is no document associated with this notice. (ivaS, COURTSTAFF) (Filed on 4/24/2019)
April 24, 2019 Filing 11 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Michael R. Rattagan.. (Cialone, Frank) (Filed on 4/24/2019)
April 22, 2019 Filing 10 Summons Issued as to Uber International Holdings, BV, Uber International, BV, Uber Technologies, Inc.. (jmlS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/22/2019)
April 22, 2019 Filing 9 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Case Management Statement due by 7/23/2019. Initial Case Management Conference set for 7/30/2019 01:30 PM. (jmlS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/22/2019)
April 15, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 8 Order by Magistrate Judge Kandis A. Westmore granting #6 Motion for Pro Hac Vice as to Christopher Dean. (ivaS, COURTSTAFF) (Filed on 4/15/2019)
April 15, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 7 Order by Magistrate Judge Kandis A. Westmore granting #3 Motion for Pro Hac Vice as to Stephen Rosenfeld. (ivaS, COURTSTAFF) (Filed on 4/15/2019)
April 12, 2019 Filing 6 MOTION for leave to appear in Pro Hac Vice ( Filing fee $ 310, receipt number 0971-13258488.) filed by Michael R. Rattagan. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Certificate of Good Standing)(Dean, Christopher) (Filed on 4/12/2019)
April 12, 2019 Filing 5 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Kandis A. Westmore. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 4/26/2019. (srnS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/12/2019)
April 12, 2019 Filing 4 Civil Cover Sheet by Michael R. Rattagan . (Cialone, Frank) (Filed on 4/12/2019)
April 12, 2019 Filing 3 MOTION for leave to appear in Pro Hac Vice ( Filing fee $ 310, receipt number 0971-13257845.) filed by Michael R. Rattagan. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Good Standing)(Rosenfeld, Stephen) (Filed on 4/12/2019)
April 12, 2019 Filing 2 Proposed Summons. (Cialone, Frank) (Filed on 4/12/2019)
April 12, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT Breach of Fiduciary Duty, Deceit, Fraud, Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress and Negligence with jury demand against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0971-13257457.). Filed by Michael R. Rattagan. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Cialone, Frank) (Filed on 4/12/2019) Modified on 4/22/2019 (jmlS, COURT STAFF).
April 12, 2019 #Electronic filing error. Civil Cover Sheet missing information - please make a Nature of Suit selection. No judge assignment will be made until the document is e-filed. Submit you r document using Civil Events > Other Filings > Other Documents > Civil Cover Sheet Re: #1 Complaint, filed by Michael R. Rattagan (srnS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/12/2019)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Rattagan v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Uber International Holdings, BV
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Uber International, BV
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Uber Technologies, Inc.
Represented By: Lindsey Catherine Barnhart
Represented By: Jeffrey Michael Davidson
Represented By: Amy S. Heath
Represented By: Clara J. Shin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Michael R. Rattagan
Represented By: Frank A. Cialone
Represented By: Christopher Graham Dean
Represented By: Stephen J. Rosenfeld
Represented By: Miles S. Winder
Represented By: Andrew A. August
Represented By: Allan Steyer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?