Ziccarello v. Sanyo Energy (U.S.A.) Corporation et al
| Richard Ziccarello |
| Panasonic Corporation of North America, Sanyo Energy (U.S.A.) Corporation and Sanyo North America Corporation |
| 3:2019cv01995 |
| April 12, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Edward M Chen |
| Contract Product Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 10, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 29 ADR Certification (ADR L.R. 3-5 b) of discussion of ADR options (Singh, David) (Filed on 7/10/2019) |
| Filing 28 ADR Certification (ADR L.R. 3-5 b) of discussion of ADR options Plaintiff's ADR Certification by Parties and Counsel (Birka-White, David) (Filed on 7/10/2019) |
Filing 27
Order by Judge Edward M. Chen granting #26 Stipulation Scheduling Order as Amended Regarding Plaintiff Filing an Opposition to Defendants' Motion to Strike, Stay, or Dismiss and Defendants' Reply Thereto. Motion hearing currently scheduled for 8/29/2019 and cmc currently scheduled for 8/1/2019 are continued pending a ruling on the Dickerts Motion and shall be reset at an appropriate time. (afmS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/10/2019) Modified on 7/10/2019 (afmS, COURT STAFF).
|
| Filing 26 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER Stipulated [Proposed] Scheduling Order Regarding Plaintiff Filing Opposition to Defendants' Motion to Strike, Stay or Dismiss and Defendants' Reply Thereto filed by Richard Ziccarello. (Birka-White, David) (Filed on 7/9/2019) |
| Filing 25 NOTICE of Change In Counsel by David Ramraj Singh Notice of Withdrawal of Attorney John A. Stratford (Singh, David) (Filed on 7/9/2019) |
|
Filing 24
Order by Judge Edward M. Chen granting #23 Stipulation Regarding Extension of Deadlines re: #21 Motion to Strike. Plaintiff's opposition due 7/10/2019; defendants' reply due 8/15/2019; hearing set 8/29/2019 at 1:30 p.m.(afmS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/17/2019)
|
| Set/Reset Deadlines as to #21 MOTION to Strike or Stay MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction. Responses due by 7/10/2019. Replies due by 8/15/2019. Motion Hearing reset for 8/29/2019 01:30 PM in San Francisco, Courtroom 05, 17th Floor before Judge Edward M. Chen. (afmS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/17/2019) |
| Filing 23 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER REGARDING DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO STRIKE filed by Richard Ziccarello. (Taylor, Russell) (Filed on 6/13/2019) |
| Filing 22 Declaration in Support of #21 MOTION to Strike or Stay, MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction filed by Panasonic Corporation of North America, Sanyo Energy (U.S.A.) Corporation, Sanyo North America Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Related document(s) #21 ) (Singh, David) (Filed on 5/30/2019) Modified on 5/31/2019 (slhS, COURT STAFF). |
| Filing 21 MOTION to Strike or Stay, MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction Defendants' Notice of Motion and Motion to Strike, Stay, or Dismiss for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction filed by Panasonic Corporation of North America, Sanyo Energy (U.S.A.) Corporation, Sanyo North America Corporation. Motion Hearing set for 7/11/2019 01:30 PM in San Francisco, Courtroom 05, 17th Floor before Judge Edward M. Chen. Responses due by 6/13/2019. Replies due by 6/20/2019. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Singh, David) (Filed on 5/30/2019) Modified on 5/31/2019 (slhS, COURT STAFF). |
|
Filing 20
Order by Judge Edward M. Chen granting #19 Motion for Pro Hac Vice.(afmS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/22/2019)
|
| Filing 19 MOTION for leave to appear in Pro Hac Vice of David L. Yohai ( Filing fee $ 310, receipt number 0971-13369769.) filed by Panasonic Corporation of North America, Sanyo Energy (U.S.A.) Corporation, Sanyo North America Corporation. (Yohai, David) (Filed on 5/22/2019) |
|
Filing 18
CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE ORDER IN REASSIGNED CASE: Initial Case Management Conference set for 8/1/2019 09:30 AM in San Francisco, Courtroom 05, 17th Floor. Joint Case Management Statement due by 7/25/2019. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 5/16/2019. (afmS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/16/2019)
|
| Filing 17 Case reassigned to Judge Edward M. Chen. Judge Jon S. Tigar no longer assigned to the case. Notice: The assigned judge participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order No. 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras. (haS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/16/2019) |
|
Filing 16
RELATED CASE ORDER. Case related to 18-cv-4664-EMC. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 5/15/2019. (afmS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/15/2019)
|
| Filing 15 CLERK'S NOTICE SETTING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. Case Management Statement due by 7/24/2019. Initial Case Management Conference set for 7/31/2019 at 2:00 p.m. in San Francisco, Courtroom 9, 19th Floor. (Attachments: #1 Standing Order, #2 Standing Order for All Judges of the Northern District) (wsnS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/10/2019) |
|
Filing 14
ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned using a proportionate, random, and blind system pursuant to General Order No. 44 to Judge Jon S. Tigar for all further proceedings. Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu no longer assigned to case, Notice: The assigned judge participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order No. 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras. Signed by the Clerk on 05/09/2019. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Eligibility for Video Recording)(ajsS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/9/2019)
|
| Filing 13 CLERK'S NOTICE OF IMPENDING REASSIGNMENT TO A U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE: The Clerk of this Court will now randomly reassign this case to a District Judge because either (1) a party has not consented to the jurisdiction of a Magistrate Judge, or (2) time is of the essence in deciding a pending judicial action for which the necessary consents to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction have not been secured. You will be informed by separate notice of the district judge to whom this case is reassigned. ALL HEARING DATES PRESENTLY SCHEDULED BEFORE THE CURRENT MAGISTRATE JUDGE ARE VACATED AND SHOULD BE RE-NOTICED FOR HEARING BEFORE THE JUDGE TO WHOM THIS CASE IS REASSIGNED. This is a text only docket entry; there is no document associated with this notice. (ig, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/8/2019) |
| Filing 12 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Panasonic Corporation of North America, Sanyo Energy (U.S.A.) Corporation, Sanyo North America Corporation.. (Singh, David) (Filed on 5/8/2019) |
| Filing 11 CLERK'S NOTICE TO DEFENDANTS Re: Consent or Declination: Defendants shall file a consent or declination to proceed before a magistrate judge. Note that any party is free to withhold consent to proceed before a magistrate judge without adverse substantive consequences. The forms are available at: http://cand.uscourts.gov/civilforms. Consent/Declination due by 5/22/2019. (ig, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/8/2019) |
| Filing 10 DEFENDANTS' DISCLOSURE OF INTERESTED ENTITIES or Persons Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1(A) and Civil Local Rule 3-15 by Panasonic Corporation of North America, Sanyo Energy (U.S.A.) Corporation, Sanyo North America Corporation identifying Corporate Parent Panasonic Corporation, Corporate Parent Panasonic Holding (Netherlands) B.V. for Panasonic Corporation of North America. (Singh, David) (Filed on 5/7/2019) Modified on 5/8/2019 (ajsS, COURT STAFF). Modified on 5/8/2019 (ajsS, COURT STAFF). |
| Filing 9 JOINT STIPULATION to Extend Time to Answer, Move, or Otherwise Respond to Complaint filed by Panasonic Corporation of North America, Sanyo Energy (U.S.A.) Corporation, Sanyo North America Corporation and Richard Ziccarello. (Singh, David) (Filed on 5/7/2019) Modified on 5/8/2019 (ajsS, COURT STAFF). |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Pendency of Other Action or Proceeding by Richard Ziccarello (Birka-White, David) (Filed on 5/3/2019) Modified on 5/3/2019 (ajsS, COURT STAFF). |
| Filing 7 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Richard Ziccarello.. (Birka-White, David) (Filed on 4/30/2019) |
| Filing 6 Certificate of Interested Entities by Richard Ziccarello (Birka-White, David) (Filed on 4/16/2019) |
| Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Panasonic Corporation of North America, Sanyo Energy (U.S.A.) Corporation, Sanyo North America Corporation. (ajsS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/15/2019) |
| Filing 4 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Case Management Statement due by 7/24/2019. Initial Case Management Conference set for 7/31/2019 01:30 PM in Oakland, Courtroom 4, 3rd Floor. (ajsS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/15/2019) |
| Filing 3 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 4/29/2019. (haS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/15/2019) |
| Filing 2 Proposed Summons. (Birka-White, David) (Filed on 4/12/2019) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0971-13258531.). Filed by Richard Ziccarello. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Birka-White, David) (Filed on 4/12/2019) Modified on 4/15/2019 (ajsS, COURT STAFF). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
