Castillo-Antonio v. Singh et al
| Jose Daniel Castillo-Antonio |
| Malkit Singh, Harjinder Kaur, Malkit Singh individually and doing business as Mercado La Hacienda and Harjinder Kaur individually and doing business as Mercado La Hacienda |
| 3:2019cv02097 |
| April 18, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Thomas S Hixson |
| American with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 20, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 14
ORDER clarifying termination of Motion to Strike. Signed by Judge Thomas S. Hixson on 6/20/2019. (tshlc2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/20/2019)
|
|
Filing 13
ORDER staying briefing on Motion to Strike. The parties are ORDERED to continue with the General Order 56 deadlines as outlined in their Initial Scheduling Order. ECF No. 5. Signed by Judge Thomas S. Hixson on 6/11/2019. (tshlc2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/11/2019)
|
| Filing 12 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Jose Daniel Castillo-Antonio for motion to strike (Mac Bride, Richard) (Filed on 6/5/2019) |
| Filing 11 MOTION to Strike motion to strike answer filed by Jose Daniel Castillo-Antonio. Motion Hearing set for 7/11/2019 10:00 AM in San Francisco, Courtroom A, 15th Floor before Magistrate Judge Thomas S. Hixson. Responses due by 6/17/2019. Replies due by 6/24/2019. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Declaration)(Mac Bride, Richard) (Filed on 6/3/2019) |
| Filing 10 ANSWER to Complaint byMalkit Singh. (hdjS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/14/2019) |
| Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Jose Daniel Castillo-Antonio. All Defendants. (Mac Bride, Richard) (Filed on 5/7/2019) |
| Filing 9 Letter from Harjinder Kaur. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(hdjS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/2/2019) |
| Filing 8 Letter from Malik Singh. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(hdjS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/2/2019) |
| Filing 6 Summons Issued as to Harjinder Kaur, Malkit Singh. (mclS, COURT STAFF) |
| Filing 5 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order for Cases Asserting Denial of Right of Access under Americans with Disabilities Act. (mclS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/19/2019) |
| Filing 4 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Jose Daniel Castillo-Antonio.. (Mac Bride, Richard) (Filed on 4/18/2019) |
| Filing 3 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Thomas S. Hixson. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 5/2/2019. (srnS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/18/2019) |
| Filing 2 Proposed Summons. (Mac Bride, Richard) (Filed on 4/18/2019) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0971-13271129.). Filed byJose Daniel Castillo-Antonio. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Mac Bride, Richard) (Filed on 4/18/2019) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
