Regan v. California State Government et al
| John Regan, Jr. |
| California State Government and California Courts |
| 3:2019cv02574 |
| May 13, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Sallie Kim |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 2, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
ORDER SCREENING COMPLAINT PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. 1915 by Magistrate Judge Sallie Kim. The #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis is granted. Amended Complaint due by 6/14/2019. (Attachments: #1 Certificate/Proof of Service)(mklS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/15/2019)
|
| Filing 3 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Case Management Statement due by 8/5/2019. Initial Case Management Conference set for 8/12/2019 01:30 PM in San Francisco, Courtroom C, 15th Floor. (Attachments: #1 Standing Order)(cjlS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/13/2019) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by John Regan, Jr. (cjlS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/13/2019) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT (with jury demand) against California Courts, California State Government. Filed by John Regan, Jr. Consent/Declination due by 5/28/2019. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(cjlS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/13/2019) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
