Kaplan v. Tetra Tech EC, Inc. et al
Plaintiff: Andrew Kaplan
Defendant: Emile Haddad, Tetra Tech, Inc., Bill Dougherty, Nick Zaferes, Tetra Tech EC, Inc., HPS1 Block 54 LLC, FivePoint Holdings LLC and Lennar Corporation
Case Number: 3:2019cv02740
Filed: May 20, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Presiding Judge: James Donato
Nature of Suit: Torts to Land
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 13, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 13, 2019 Filing 16 Case reassigned to Judge James Donato per related case order. Judge Haywood S Gilliam, Jr no longer assigned to the case. Notice: The assigned judge participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order No. 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras. (srnS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/13/2019)
June 12, 2019 Filing 15 CLERK'S NOTICE SETTING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE FOR REASSIGNED CIVIL CASE. Notice is hereby given that a Case Management Conference has been set for August 27, 2019, before Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr., at 2:00 p.m., in Courtroom 2, 4th Floor, 1301 Clay Street, Oakland, CA. Case Management Statement due by August 20, 2019. Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. All future filings should reflect the case number as 4:19-cv-02740-HSG. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/12/2019)
June 12, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 14 ORDER RELATING CASE.. Signed by Judge James Donato on 6/12/19. (lrcS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/12/2019)
June 10, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 13 ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned using a proportionate, random, and blind system pursuant to General Order No. 44 to Judge Haywood S Gilliam, Jr for all further proceedings. Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu no longer assigned to case. Signed by the Clerk on 06/10/2019. (ajsS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/10/2019)
June 7, 2019 Filing 12 CLERK'S NOTICE OF IMPENDING REASSIGNMENT TO A U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE: The Clerk of this Court will now randomly reassign this case to a District Judge because either (1) a party has not consented to the jurisdiction of a Magistrate Judge, or (2) time is of the essence in deciding a pending judicial action for which the necessary consents to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction have not been secured. You will be informed by separate notice of the district judge to whom this case is reassigned. ALL HEARING DATES PRESENTLY SCHEDULED BEFORE THE CURRENT MAGISTRATE JUDGE ARE VACATED AND SHOULD BE RE-NOTICED FOR HEARING BEFORE THE JUDGE TO WHOM THIS CASE IS REASSIGNED. This is a text only docket entry; there is no document associated with this notice. (ig, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/7/2019)
June 6, 2019 Filing 11 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Andrew Kaplan.. (Murphy, Anne Marie) (Filed on 6/6/2019)
June 6, 2019 Filing 10 CLERK'S NOTICE Re: Consent or Declination: Plaintiff and Defendants shall file a consent or declination to proceed before a magistrate judge. Note that any party is free to withhold consent to proceed before a magistrate judge without adverse substantive consequences. The forms are available at: http://cand.uscourts.gov/civilforms. Consent/Declination due by 6/20/2019. (ig, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/6/2019)
May 23, 2019 Filing 9 STIPULATION Extending Time to Respond to Complaint filed by FivePoint Holdings LLC, Andrew Kaplan, Tetra Tech EC, Inc., Tetra Tech, Inc., Lennar Corporation, HPS1 Block 54 LLC, Bill Dougherty, Nick Zaferes, and Emile Haddad .(Wickersham, Matthew) (Filed on 5/23/2019) Modified on 5/24/2019 (ajsS, COURT STAFF).
May 23, 2019 Filing 8 NOTICE of Proof of Filing In State Court of Notice to Adverse Parties of Removal to Federal Court by Tetra Tech EC, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Oliver-Thompson, Megan) (Filed on 5/23/2019) Modified on 5/24/2019 (ajsS, COURT STAFF).
May 23, 2019 Filing 7 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Tetra Tech EC, Inc. re #1 Notice of Removal, #5 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines, #2 Certificate of Interested Entities, 4 Case Assigned by Intake,,, #3 Certificate of Interested Entities (Oliver-Thompson, Megan) (Filed on 5/23/2019)
May 22, 2019 Filing 6 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Andrew Kaplan Proof of Service of Summons and Complaint on: Tetra Tech, Inc.; Tetra Tech EC, Inc.; Lennar Corporation; HPS1 Blook 54 LLC; FivePoint Holdings, LLC; Bill Dougherty; Nick Zaferes and Emile Haddad (Murphy, Anne Marie) (Filed on 5/22/2019)
May 22, 2019 Filing 5 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Case Management Statement due by 8/14/2019. Initial Case Management Conference set for 8/21/2019 01:30 PM in Oakland, Courtroom 4, 3rd Floor. (ajsS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/22/2019)
May 21, 2019 Filing 4 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 6/4/2019. (as, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/21/2019)
May 20, 2019 Filing 3 Rule 7.1 Disclosures by Tetra Tech EC, Inc. identifying Corporate Parent Tetra Tech, Inc. for Tetra Tech EC, Inc.. re #1 Notice of Removal, (Oliver-Thompson, Megan) (Filed on 5/20/2019)
May 20, 2019 Filing 2 Certificate of Interested Entities by Tetra Tech EC, Inc. identifying Corporate Parent Tetra Tech, Inc., Other Affiliate United States Navy for Tetra Tech EC, Inc.. re #1 Notice of Removal, (Oliver-Thompson, Megan) (Filed on 5/20/2019)
May 20, 2019 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from San Francisco Superior. Their case number is CGC-19-575289. (No process) (Filing fee $400 receipt number 0971-13363843). Filed byTetra Tech EC, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Civil Cover Sheet)(Oliver-Thompson, Megan) (Filed on 5/20/2019) Modified on 5/22/2019 (ajsS, COURT STAFF).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Kaplan v. Tetra Tech EC, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Emile Haddad
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Tetra Tech, Inc.
Represented By: Geoffrey R. Pittman
Represented By: Davina Pujari
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Bill Dougherty
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Nick Zaferes
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Tetra Tech EC, Inc.
Represented By: Megan Oliver-Thompson
Represented By: Geoffrey R. Pittman
Represented By: Davina Pujari
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: HPS1 Block 54 LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: FivePoint Holdings LLC
Represented By: Matthew Chase Wickersham
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Lennar Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Andrew Kaplan
Represented By: Donald James Magilligan
Represented By: Anne Marie Murphy
Represented By: Julie Lynn Fieber
Represented By: Joseph W. Cotchett
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?