Evans v. Hatton et al
| Keith Evans |
| M. Bitter, K. Hoffman, J. Lewis, S. Hatton, M. Atchley and S. Defant |
| 3:2019cv02857 |
| May 24, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Laurel Beeler |
| PSLC CET |
| Prisoner: Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 13, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Keith Evans. (fabS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/13/2019) |
| Filing 5 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Keith Evans. (hdjS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/7/2019) (Additional attachment(s) added on 6/14/2019: #1 Envelope) (hdjS, COURT STAFF). |
| Filing 3 CLERK'S NOTICE re completion of In Forma Pauperis affidavit or payment of filing fee due within 28 days. IFP Form due by 7/1/2019. (aaaS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/23/2019) |
| Filing 2 Notice of Assignment of Prisoner Case to Magistrate Judge (aaaS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/23/2019) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT UNDER THE CIVIL RIGHTS ACT, TITLE 42 U.S.C. 1983; (NO PROCESS); (IFP PENDING); against M. Atchley, M. Bitter, S. Defant, S. Hatton, K. Hoffman, J. Lewis. Filed byKeith Evans. Consent/Declination due by 6/24/2019. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(aaaS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/23/2019) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
