Ketroser v. Cornerstone ATD, Inc. et al
Plaintiff: David B. Ketroser
Defendant: George Almeida and Cornerstone ATD, Inc.
Case Number: 3:2019cv02908
Filed: May 27, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Presiding Judge: Vince Chhabria
Nature of Suit: American with Disabilities - Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 31, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 23, 2019 Filing 7 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed filed by David B. Ketroser. Service waived by George Almeida waiver sent on 7/22/2019, answer due 9/20/2019. (Karbelashvili, Irene) (Filed on 7/23/2019)
July 3, 2019 Filing 6 Summons Issued as to George Almeida, Cornerstone ATD, Inc.. (fabS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/3/2019)
June 27, 2019 Filing 5 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order for Cases Asserting Denial of Right of Access under Americans with Disabilities Act. Notice: The assigned judge participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order No. 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras. (fabS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/27/2019)
May 29, 2019 Filing 4 CLERK'S NOTICE scheduling deadline to file joint status report. Status Report due by 12/2/2019. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (knm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/29/2019)
May 28, 2019 Filing 3 Case assigned to Judge Vince Chhabria. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. (as, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/28/2019)
May 27, 2019 Filing 2 Proposed Summons. (Karbelashvili, Irene) (Filed on 5/27/2019)
May 27, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT FOR INJUNCTIVE RELIEF, RESTITUTION, AND DAMAGES against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0971-13382200.). Filed byDavid B. Ketroser. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Karbelashvili, Irene) (Filed on 5/27/2019)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Ketroser v. Cornerstone ATD, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: David B. Ketroser
Represented By: Irene Karbelashvili
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: George Almeida
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Cornerstone ATD, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?