Knuettel II v. Aqua Metals, Inc.
| Francis Knuettel II |
| Aqua Metals, Inc. |
| 3:2019cv02920 |
| May 28, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Edward M Chen |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 13, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Francis Knuettel II Proof Of Service (Lowe, David) (Filed on 6/21/2019) |
Filing 10
CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE ORDER IN REASSIGNED CASE: Initial Case Management Conference set for 9/5/2019 09:30 AM in San Francisco, Courtroom 05, 17th Floor. Joint Case Management Statement due by 8/29/2019. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 6/14/2019. (afmS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/14/2019)
|
|
Filing 9
ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned using a proportionate, random, and blind system pursuant to General Order No. 44 to Judge Edward M. Chen for all further proceedings. Magistrate Judge Kandis A. Westmore no longer assigned to case, Notice: The assigned judge participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order No. 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras. Signed by the Clerk on 06/14/2019. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Eligibility for Video Recording)(ajsS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/14/2019)
|
| Filing 8 CLERK'S NOTICE OF IMPENDING REASSIGNMENT TO A U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE: The Clerk of this Court will now randomly reassign this case to a District Judge because either (1) a party has not consented to the jurisdiction of a Magistrate Judge, or (2) time is of the essence in deciding a pending judicial action for which the necessary consents to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction have not been secured. You will be informed by separate notice of the district judge to whom this case is reassigned. ALL HEARING DATES PRESENTLY SCHEDULED BEFORE THE CURRENT MAGISTRATE JUDGE ARE VACATED AND SHOULD BE RE-NOTICED FOR HEARING BEFORE THE JUDGE TO WHOM THIS CASE IS REASSIGNED. This is a text only docket entry; there is no document associated with this notice. (ivaS, COURTSTAFF) (Filed on 6/13/2019) |
| Filing 7 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Aqua Metals, Inc... (Halberda, Ashley) (Filed on 6/12/2019) |
| Filing 6 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Aqua Metals, Inc. re: Consent to the Jurisdiction of a Magistrate Judge (Halberda, Ashley) (Filed on 6/3/2019) |
| Filing 5 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Aqua Metals, Inc. re #2 Certificate of Interested Entities, #1 Notice of Removal, 3 Case Assigned by Intake,,, #4 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines (Halberda, Ashley) (Filed on 5/30/2019) |
| Filing 4 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Case Management Statement due by 8/20/2019. Initial Case Management Conference set for 8/27/2019 01:30 PM. (jmlS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/29/2019) |
| Filing 3 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Kandis A. Westmore. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 6/12/2019. (as, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/29/2019) |
| Answer to Removal Complaint filed in Alameda County Superior Court byAqua Metals, Inc. on May 24, 2019. (jmlS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/29/2019) |
| Filing 2 Certificate of Interested Entities by Aqua Metals, Inc. identifying Corporate Parent Aqua Metals, Inc. for Aqua Metals, Inc.. re #1 Notice of Removal, (Halberda, Ashley) (Filed on 5/28/2019) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL with jury demand from Alameda Superior Court. Their case number is RG19013912. (Filing fee $400 receipt number 0971-13384671). Filed by Aqua Metals, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Complaint, #2 Exhibit B - Notice of CMC and Order, #3 Exhibit C - Proof of Service, #4 Exhibit D - Answer, #5 Civil Cover Sheet)(Halberda, Ashley) (Filed on 5/28/2019) Modified on 5/29/2019 (jmlS, COURT STAFF). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Knuettel II v. Aqua Metals, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Aqua Metals, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Ashley Halberda |
| Represented By: | Todd Robin Wulffson |
| Represented By: | Margaret Leah Cameron |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Francis Knuettel II | |
| Represented By: | Michelle G. Lee |
| Represented By: | David A. Lowe |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
