Rodgers v. Saint Mary's College of California
| Jessica Rodgers |
| Saint Mary's College of California |
| 3:2019cv03253 |
| June 10, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Maxine M Chesney |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 16, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Saint Mary's College of California re #1 Notice of Removal, (Fitzsimmons, Marcie) (Filed on 6/11/2019) |
| Filing 3 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Notice: The assigned judge participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order No. 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras. This case may fall within the Pilot Program for Initial Discovery Protocols for Employment Cases Alleging Adverse Action. See #General Order 71. Parties and Counsel are directed to review G eneral Order 71 to determine whether it applies to this case, and to comply with that General Order if applicable. Case Management Statement due by 9/6/2019. Initial Case Management Conference set for 9/13/2019 10:30 AM. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Eligibility for Video Recording)(mclS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/11/2019) |
| Filing 2 Case assigned to Judge Maxine M. Chesney. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. (bwS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/10/2019) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL of Action Under 28 U.S.C. section 1441(a) (Federal Question Jurisdiction) - Copy of First Amended Complaint and Answer attached, from Contra Costa Superior Court. Their case number is C19-00225. (Filing fee $400 receipt number 0971-13423334). Filed by Saint Mary's College of California. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Moore, Sara) (Filed on 6/10/2019) Modified on 6/11/2019 (mclS, COURT STAFF). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Rodgers v. Saint Mary's College of California | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Jessica Rodgers | |
| Represented By: | Michael James Reed |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Saint Mary's College of California | |
| Represented By: | Sara Allison Moore |
| Represented By: | Marcie Isom Fitzsimmons |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
