Davis v. Monsanto Company
| Carl W Davis |
| Monsanto Company |
| 3:2019cv03271 |
| June 11, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Vince Chhabria |
| Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 11, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 Case Transferred in from United States District Court for the District of Arizona (Prescott Division); Case Number 3:19-cv-08078-DLR. Original File Certified Copy of Transfer Order and Docket Sheet Received. |
| MEMBER CASE OPENED: United States District Court for the District of Arizona (Prescott Division), 3:19-cv-08078-DLR, Carl W. Davis -v- Monsanto Company, Opened in California Northern District as 3:19-cv-03271-VC pursuant to Conditional Transfer Order (CTO-134) (cc: JPMDL) (tnS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/11/2019) |
| Filing 7 CERTIFIED MDL TRANSFER ORDER (CTO-134) Transferring Case to the Northern District of California Re MDL-2741. (MAP) |
| Remark: Case Transferred to the Northern District of California via electronic transfer. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (MAP) |
Filing 6
ORDER that if Plaintiff fails to comply with this Order, the Clerk of Court shall dismiss this action after 6/19/2019, for Plaintiff's lack of service pursuant to Rule 4(m). Signed by Judge Douglas L Rayes on 5/21/2019. (MMO)
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER that motions pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b) are discouraged if the defect can be cured by filing an amended pleading. The parties must meet and confer prior to the filing of such motions to determine whether it can be avoided. FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff(s) serve a copy of this Order upon Defendant(s) and file a notice of service. See attached Order for complete details. Signed by Judge Douglas L Rayes on 3/18/2019. (MMO)
|
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Monsanto Company. (DLC). *** IMPORTANT: When printing the summons, select "Document and stamps" or "Document and comments" for the seal to appear on the document. |
| Filing 3 Filing fee paid, receipt number 0970-16665797. This case has been assigned to the Honorable Douglas L Rayes. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV-19-8078-PCT-DLR. Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge to Exercise Jurisdiction form attached. (DLC) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS Submitted by Carl W Davis. (Diamond, David) (DLC) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT. Filing fee received: $ 400.00, receipt number 0970-16665797 filed by Carl W Davis. (Diamond, David) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(DLC) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Davis v. Monsanto Company | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Monsanto Company | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Carl W Davis | |
| Represented By: | David J. Diamond |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
