Express Mobile, Inc. v. Rauxa Direct, LLC
Plaintiff: Express Mobile, Inc. and Rauxa Direct, LLC
Case Number: 3:2019cv03357
Filed: June 13, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Presiding Judge: Richard Seeborg
Referring Judge: Jon S Tigar
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35 U.S.C. ยง 145
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
RSS RSS Track this Docket
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 10, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 6, 2019 Filing 11 CLERK'S NOTICE You are notified that the Court has scheduled a Telephonic Case Management Conference before Judge Richard Seeborg upon reassignment. For a copy of Judge Seeborg's Standing Order and other information, please refer to the Court's website at www.cand.uscourts.gov. All parties shall appear telephonically and must contact Court Conference at 866/582-6878 at least one week prior to the Conference. Case Management Statement due by 9/5/2019. Initial Case Management Conference set for 9/12/2019 at 11:00 AM to be held telephonically in San Francisco, Chambers. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/6/2019)
July 31, 2019 Opinion or Order ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned to Judge Richard Seeborg for all further proceedings. Judge Jon S. Tigar no longer assigned to case,. Signed by Clerk on 7/31/19. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (as, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/31/2019)
July 29, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER RELATING CASE(s): C-17-2605 RS; C-19-3350 JSW; C-19-3351 YGR; C-19-3352 RS; C-19-3353 JST; C-19-3355 EJD; C-19-3356 EMC and C-19-3357 JST... Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 7/26/2019. (tlS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/29/2019)
July 25, 2019 Filing 9 CLERK'S NOTICE RESCHEDULING THE INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE FROM 9/11/2019 TO 11/25/2019. Judge Tigar's Case Management Conference calendar will shift from Wednesday afternoons to Monday afternoons, therefore this case is being rescheduled consistent with the change. Case Management Statement due by 11/18/2019 by 5:00 PM. Initial Case Management Conference set for 11/25/2019 2:00 PM in Oakland, Courtroom 6, 2nd Floor. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (mllS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/25/2019)
July 8, 2019 Filing 8 Stipulation for First Extension of Time to Answer or Otherwise Respond to re #1 Complaint filed by Rauxa Direct, LLC. (Overend, William) (Filed on 7/8/2019)
June 27, 2019 Filing 7 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Express Mobile, Inc... (Craft, Jeffrey) (Filed on 6/27/2019)
June 14, 2019 Filing 6 Summons Issued as to Defendant Rauxa Direct, LLC. (tnS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/14/2019)
June 14, 2019 Filing 5 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Notice: The assigned judge participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order No. 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras. Joint Case Management Statement due by 9/4/2019. Initial Case Management Conference set for 9/11/2019 02:00 PM in San Francisco, Courtroom 09, 19th Floor. (tnS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/14/2019)
June 13, 2019 Filing 4 Case assigned to Judge Jon S. Tigar. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. (haS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/13/2019)
June 13, 2019 Filing 3 REPORT on the filing of an action regarding patent infringement - US 6,546,397 B1; US 7,594,168 B2; US 9,471,287 B2; US 9,928,044 B2 (cc: form mailed to register). (Craft, Jeffrey) (Filed on 6/13/2019)
June 13, 2019 Filing 2 Proposed Summons. (Craft, Jeffrey) (Filed on 6/13/2019)
June 13, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Patent Infringement against Rauxa Direct, LLC, (Filing Fee: $400.00, receipt number 0971-13433940). Filed by Express Mobile, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F, #7 Exhibit G, #8 Civil Cover Sheet)(Craft, Jeffrey) (Filed on 6/13/2019)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Express Mobile, Inc. v. Rauxa Direct, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Express Mobile, Inc.
Represented By: Jeffrey Francis Craft
Represented By: Timothy Devlin
Represented By: Robert Dean Kiddie, Jr.
Represented By: Seth Wesley Wiener
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Rauxa Direct, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?