O'Neill v. Whirlpool Corporation
Plaintiff: Michael O'Neill
Defendant: Whirlpool Corporation
Case Number: 3:2019cv04208
Filed: July 22, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Presiding Judge: Sallie Kim
Nature of Suit: Prop. Damage Prod. Liability
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 6, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 6, 2019 Filing 7 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Michael O'Neill.. (Warshaw, Daniel) (Filed on 8/6/2019)
July 24, 2019 Filing 6 Summons Issued as to Defendant Whirlpool Corporation. (tnS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/24/2019)
July 24, 2019 Filing 5 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Joint Case Management Statement due by 10/14/2019. Initial Case Management Conference set for 10/21/2019 at 1:30 PM in San Francisco, Courtroom C, 15th Floor. (tnS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/24/2019)
July 23, 2019 Filing 4 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Sallie Kim. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 8/6/2019. (srnS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/23/2019)
July 22, 2019 Filing 3 Civil Cover Sheet filed by Michael O'Neill. (Warshaw, Daniel) (Filed on 7/22/2019)
July 22, 2019 Filing 2 Proposed Summons. (Warshaw, Daniel) (Filed on 7/22/2019)
July 22, 2019 Filing 1 CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT for (1) Strict Liability: Failure to Warn; (2) Strict Liability: Manufacturing Defect; (3) Strict Liability: Design Defect; (4) Negligence; (5) Negligence: Failure to Recall/Retrofit; (6) Breach of Express Warranty; (7) Breach of Implied Warranty of Fitness; (8) Breach of Implied Warranty of Merchantability; (9) Violations of Cal. Civ. Code Section 1790; (10) Violations of Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code Section 17200, and (11) Violations of Cal. Civ. Code Section 1750; Demand for Jury Trial against Whirlpool Corporation ( Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0971-13543130.). Filed byMichael O'Neill. (Attachments: #(1) Declaration Declaration of Daniel L. Warshaw Re: Cal Civ Code 1780)(Warshaw, Daniel) (Filed on 7/22/2019) Modified on 7/24/2019 (tnS, COURT STAFF).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: O'Neill v. Whirlpool Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Whirlpool Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Michael O'Neill
Represented By: Daniel L. Warshaw
Represented By: Benjamin E. Shiftan
Represented By: Michael Harrison Pearson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?