Mckay v. Doordash, Inc.
Plaintiff: Raymond Mckay
Defendant: Doordash, Inc.
Case Number: 3:2019cv04289
Filed: July 26, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Presiding Judge: Maxine M Chesney
Referring Judge: Sallie Kim
Nature of Suit: Labor: Fair Standards
Cause of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 25, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 12, 2019 Filing 33 SUR-REPLY (re #26 MOTION to Compel Arbitration ) in Opposition filed byRaymond Mckay. (Keller, Ashley) (Filed on 9/12/2019) Modified on 9/13/2019 (mclS, COURT STAFF).
September 12, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 32 ORDER GRANTING JOINT STIPULATION TO ALLOW PLAINTIFF TO FILE A SUR-REPLY IN OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION. Plaintiff shall file the sur-reply no later than September 13, 2019. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on September 12, 2019. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/12/2019)
September 10, 2019 Filing 31 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER to Allow Plaintiff to File a Sur-Reply in Opposition to Motion to Compel Arbitration filed by Raymond Mckay. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order, #2 Exhibit 1)(Keller, Ashley) (Filed on 9/10/2019)
September 3, 2019 Filing 30 REPLY (re #26 MOTION to Compel Arbitration ) filed byDoordash, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Declaration)(Lipshutz, Joshua) (Filed on 9/3/2019)
August 26, 2019 Filing 29 OPPOSITION/RESPONSE (re #26 MOTION to Compel Arbitration ) filed byRaymond Mckay. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Raymond Mckay, #2 Declaration of Christina Mckay, #3 Declaration of Ashley Keller, #4 Proposed Order denying DoorDash's Motion to Compel Arbitration)(Keller, Ashley) (Filed on 8/26/2019)
August 13, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 28 ORDER VACATING HEARING AND STAYING BRIEFING ON PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on August 13, 2019. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/13/2019)
August 12, 2019 Filing 27 NOTICE of Appearance by Theane Evangelis (Evangelis, Theane) (Filed on 8/12/2019)
August 12, 2019 Filing 26 MOTION to Compel Arbitration filed by Doordash, Inc.. Motion Hearing set for 10/25/2019 09:00 AM in San Francisco, Courtroom 07, 19th Floor before Judge Maxine M. Chesney. Responses due by 8/26/2019. Replies due by 9/3/2019. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Stanley Tang, #2 Declaration of Cody Aughney, #3 Declaration of Joshua Lipshutz, #4 Proposed Order Granting Motion to Compel Arbitration)(Lipshutz, Joshua) (Filed on 8/12/2019)
August 12, 2019 Filing 25 NOTICE of Appearance by Joshua Seth Lipshutz (Lipshutz, Joshua) (Filed on 8/12/2019)
August 7, 2019 Filing 24 MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment filed by Raymond Mckay. Motion Hearing set for 9/13/2019 09:00 AM in San Francisco, Courtroom 07, 19th Floor before Judge Maxine M. Chesney. Responses due by 8/21/2019. Replies due by 8/28/2019. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order, #2 Declaration of Raymond Mckay, #3 Declaration of Ashley Keller, #4 Exhibit A, #5 Exhibit B, #6 Exhibit C, #7 Exhibit D, #8 Exhibit E, #9 Exhibit F, #10 Exhibit G, #11 Exhibit H, #12 Exhibit I, #13 Exhibit J, #14 Exhibit K, #15 Exhibit L, #16 Exhibit M, #17 Exhibit N, #18 Exhibit O, #19 Exhibit P)(Keller, Ashley) (Filed on 8/7/2019)
August 6, 2019 Filing 23 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Raymond Mckay. Doordash, Inc. served on 7/30/2019, answer due 8/20/2019. (Keller, Ashley) (Filed on 8/6/2019)
August 2, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 22 ORDER DENYING WITHOUT PREJUDICE MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on August 2, 2019. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/2/2019)
August 2, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 21 ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION FOR ADMISSION OF ATTORNEY PRO HAC VICE. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on August 2, 2019. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/2/2019)
August 2, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 20 ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION FOR ADMISSION OF ATTORNEY PRO HAC VICE. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on August 2, 2019. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/2/2019)
August 2, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 19 ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION FOR ADMISSION OF ATTORNEY PRO HAC VICE. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on August 2, 2019. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/2/2019)
August 2, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 18 ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION FOR ADMISSION OF ATTORNEY PRO HAC VICE. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on August 2, 2019. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/2/2019)
July 30, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 17 CASE MANAGEMENT SCHEDULING ORDER: Initial Case Management Conference set for 10/25/2019 10:30 AM in San Francisco, Courtroom 07, 19th Floor. Joint Case Management Statement due by 10/18/2019.. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on 7/30/2019. (Attachments: #1 Standing Order for Judge Maxine M. Chesney, #2 Standing Order for All Judges)(tlS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/30/2019)
July 30, 2019 Filing 16 Renotice motion hearing re #4 MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment filed byRaymond Mckay. (Related document(s) #4 ) (Custis, Keith) (Filed on 7/30/2019)
July 30, 2019 Set/Reset Deadlines as to #4 MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment . Motion Hearing reset to 8/30/2019 09:00 AM in San Francisco, Courtroom 07, 19th Floor before Judge Maxine M. Chesney. (tlS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/30/2019)
July 29, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 15 ORDER, Case Reassigned using a proportionate, random, and blind system pursuant to General Order No. 44 to Judge Maxine M. Chesney for all further proceedings. Magistrate Judge Sallie Kim no longer assigned to the case. Notice: The assigned judge participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order No. 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras.. Signed by The Clerk on 7/29/19. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Eligibility for Video Recording)(haS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/29/2019)
July 29, 2019 Filing 14 Summons Issued as to Defendant Doordash, Inc.. (tnS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/29/2019)
July 29, 2019 Filing 13 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: This case may fall within the Pilot Program for Initial Discovery Protocols for Employment Cases Alleging Adverse Action. See #General Order 71. Parties and Counsel are directed to review General Order 71 to determine whether it applies to this case, and to comply with that General Order if applicable. Joint Case Management Statement du e by 10/21/2019. Initial Case Management Conference set for 10/28/2019 at 1:30 PM in San Francisco, Courtroom C, 15th Floor. (tnS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/29/2019)
July 29, 2019 Filing 12 CLERK'S NOTICE OF IMPENDING REASSIGNMENT TO A U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE: The Clerk of this Court will now randomly reassign this case to a District Judge because either (1) a party has not consented to the jurisdiction of a Magistrate Judge, or (2) time is of the essence in deciding a pending judicial action for which the necessary consents to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction have not been secured. You will be informed by separate notice of the district judge to whom this case is reassigned. ALL HEARING DATES PRESENTLY SCHEDULED BEFORE THE CURRENT MAGISTRATE JUDGE ARE VACATED AND SHOULD BE RE-NOTICED FOR HEARING BEFORE THE JUDGE TO WHOM THIS CASE IS REASSIGNED. This is a text only docket entry; there is no document associated with this notice. (mklS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/29/2019)
July 26, 2019 Filing 11 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge filed by Raymond Mckay. (Custis, Keith) (Filed on 7/26/2019)
July 26, 2019 Filing 10 MOTION for Leave to Appear in Pro Hac Vice, (Filing Fee: $310.00, receipt number 0971-13556799) filed by Raymond Mckay. (Attachments: #(1) Certificate of Good Standing)(Reddish, Marquel) (Filed on 7/26/2019)
July 26, 2019 Filing 9 MOTION for Leave to Appear in Pro Hac Vice, (Filing Fee: $310.00, receipt number 0971-13556782) filed by Raymond Mckay. (Attachments: #(1) Certificate of Good Standing)(Postman, Warren) (Filed on 7/26/2019)
July 26, 2019 Filing 8 MOTION for Leave to Appear in Pro Hac Vice, (Filing Fee: $310.00, receipt number 0971-13556777) filed by Raymond Mckay. (Attachments: #(1) Certificate of Good Standing)(Lenkner, Travis) (Filed on 7/26/2019)
July 26, 2019 Filing 7 MOTION for Leave to Appear in Pro Hac Vice, (Filing Fee: $310.00, receipt number 0971-13556769) filed by Raymond Mckay. (Attachments: #(1) Certificate of Good Standing)(Keller, Ashley) (Filed on 7/26/2019)
July 26, 2019 Filing 6 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Sallie Kim. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 8/9/2019. (srnS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/26/2019)
July 26, 2019 Filing 5 Declaration of Ashley Keller in Support of #4 MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment filed by Raymond Mckay. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F, #7 Exhibit G, #8 Exhibit H, #9 Exhibit I, #10 Exhibit J, #11 Exhibit K, #12 Exhibit L, #13 Exhibit M, #14 Exhibit N, #15 Exhibit O, #16 Exhibit P)(Related document(s) #4 ) (Custis, Keith) (Filed on 7/26/2019)
July 26, 2019 Filing 4 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment; Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support Thereof filed by Raymond Mckay. Motion Hearing set for 8/30/2019 02:00 PM in San Francisco, Chambers before Judge ABC. Responses due by 8/9/2019. Replies due by 8/16/2019. (Attachments: #(1) [Proposed] Order, #(2) Declaration of Raymond Mckay)(Custis, Keith) (Filed on 7/26/2019)
July 26, 2019 Filing 3 Certification of Interested Entities or Persons filed by Raymond Mckay (Custis, Keith) (Filed on 7/26/2019)
July 26, 2019 Filing 2 Proposed Summons. (Custis, Keith) (Filed on 7/26/2019)
July 26, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT for: (1) Failure to Pay Minimum Wage Under The FLSA; (2) Failure to Pay Minimum Wage Under The California Labor Code; (3) Failure to Provide Wage Statements Under The California Labor Code; (4) Violation of Unfair Competition Law; Jury Trial Demanded against Defendant Doordash, Inc., (Filing Fee: $400.00, receipt number 0971-13555661). Filed by Raymond Mckay. (Attachments: #(1) Civil Cover Sheet)(Custis, Keith) (Filed on 7/26/2019) Modified on 7/29/2019 (tnS, COURT STAFF).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Mckay v. Doordash, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Raymond Mckay
Represented By: Ashley Conrad Keller
Represented By: Travis Lenkner
Represented By: Warren D Postman
Represented By: Marquel P Reddish
Represented By: Keith Custis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Doordash, Inc.
Represented By: Theane Evangelis
Represented By: Joshua Seth Lipshutz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?