Danielsson v. Blood Centers of the Pacific, et al
Ruby Danielsson |
Blood Centers of the Pacific, Vitalant, Blood Systems and Vitalant doing business as Blood Centers of the Pacific formerly known as Blood Systems |
3:2019cv04592 |
August 7, 2019 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
Joseph C Spero |
Labor: Other |
28 U.S.C. § 1332 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 19, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 22 CLERK'S NOTICE Continuing Motion Hearing as to #16 MOTION to Remand and Changing Time for Initial Case Management Conference. Initial Case Management Conference previously set for 11/8/19 at 2:00 PM, has been re-set for 11/8/2019 at 09:30 AM in San Francisco, Courtroom G, 15th Floor. Motion Hearing, previously set for 10/18/19 at 9:30 AM, has been re-set for 11/8/2019 09:30 AM in San Francisco, Courtroom G, 15th Floor before Chief Magistrate Judge Joseph C. Spero. (Related documents(s) #16 ) (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.)(klhS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/2/2019) |
Filing 21 SUPPLEMENTAL Filing Regarding Affirmative Defenses by Vitalant. (Bowman, Lisa) (Filed on 9/26/2019) Modified on 9/26/2019 (gbaS, COURT STAFF). |
Filing 20 REPLY (re #16 MOTION to Remand ) filed byRuby Danielsson. (Klein, Jeffrey) (Filed on 9/25/2019) |
Filing 19 ORDER on #17 Stipulation. Signed by Chief Magistrate Judge Joseph C. Spero on September 25, 2019. (jcslc2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/25/2019) |
Filing 18 OPPOSITION/RESPONSE (re #16 MOTION to Remand ) filed byVitalant. (Attachments: #1 Declaration)(Bowman, Lisa) (Filed on 9/18/2019) |
Filing 17 Statement re #15 Order, Joint Statement and Stipulation Regarding Defendant Vitalant's Affirmative Defenses and Prayer for Relief by Vitalant. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Bowman, Lisa) (Filed on 9/10/2019) |
Filing 16 MOTION to Remand filed by Ruby Danielsson. Motion Hearing set for 10/18/2019 09:30 AM in San Francisco, Courtroom G, 15th Floor before Magistrate Judge Joseph C. Spero. Responses due by 9/18/2019. Replies due by 9/25/2019. (Klein, Jeffrey) (Filed on 9/4/2019) |
Filing 15 ORDER to meet and confer regarding #14 Motion to Strike. The parties shall file a joint statement no later than September 11, 2019. If any part of the motion remains in dispute, Defendant's opposition is due September 25, 2019, and Plaintiff's reply is due October 2, 2019. The hearing noticed for October 18, 2019 is CONTINUED to October 25, 2019. Signed by Chief Judge Joseph C. Spero on August 29, 2019. (jcslc2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/29/2019) |
Set Deadlines/Hearings: Joint statement due by 9/11/2019. Opposition due by 9/25/2019. Reply due by 10/2/2019. Motion Hearing set for 10/25/2019 09:30 AM in San Francisco, Courtroom G, 15th Floor before Chief Magistrate Judge Joseph C. Spero. (jcslc2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/29/2019) |
Filing 14 MOTION to Strike Answer to Removal Complaint filed by Ruby Danielsson. Motion Hearing set for 10/18/2019 09:30 AM in San Francisco, Courtroom G, 15th Floor before Magistrate Judge Joseph C. Spero. Responses due by 9/11/2019. Replies due by 9/18/2019. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Klein, Jeffrey) (Filed on 8/28/2019) |
Filing 13 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Vitalant.. (Bowman, Lisa) (Filed on 8/21/2019) |
Filing 12 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Blood Centers of the Pacific NOTICE TO PLAINTIFF AND CLERK OF THE CALIFORNIA SUPERIOR COURT OF REMOVAL OF CIVIL ACTION TO UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT (Bowman, Lisa) (Filed on 8/20/2019) |
Filing 11 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Ruby Danielsson.. (Klein, Jeffrey) (Filed on 8/12/2019) |
Filing 10 AMENDED Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: This case may fall within the Pilot Program for Initial Discovery Protocols for Employment Cases Alleging Adverse Action. See #General Order 71. Parties and Counsel are directed to review General Order 71 to determine whether it applies to this case, and to comply with that General Order if applicable. Case Management Sta tement due by 11/1/2019. Initial Case Management Conference set for 11/8/2019 02:00 PM in San Francisco, Courtroom G, 15th Floor. (gbaS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/8/2019) |
Filing 9 ***ERRONEOUS ENTRY PLEASE DISREGARD, SEE AMENDED ORDER DOCKET NO. #10 *** Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: This case may fall within the Pilot Program for Initial Discovery Protocols for Employment Cases Alleging Adverse Action. See #General Order 71. Parties and Counsel are directed to review General Order 71 to determine whether it applies to this case, and to comply with that General Order if applicable. Case Management Statement due by 11/1/2019. Initial Case Management Conference set for 11/8/2019 02:00 PM in San Francisco, Courtroom G, 15th Floor. (gbaS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/7/2019) Modified on 8/8/2019 (gbaS, COURT STAFF). |
Filing 8 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Blood Centers of the Pacific, Blood Systems re #4 Certificate of Interested Entities, #7 Notice (Other), #5 Affidavit, #6 Affidavit, #3 Certificate of Interested Entities, #1 Notice of Removal, 2 Case Assigned by Intake (McInerney, Thomas) (Filed on 8/7/2019) Modified on 8/8/2019 (gbaS, COURT STAFF). |
Filing 7 NOTICE by Blood Centers of the Pacific, Blood Systems of Related Cases (McInerney, Thomas) (Filed on 8/7/2019) Modified on 8/7/2019 (gbaS, COURT STAFF). |
Filing 6 Declaration of Bhavi A. Shah re #1 Notice of Removal by Blood Centers of the Pacific, Blood Systems. (McInerney, Thomas) (Filed on 8/7/2019) Modified on 8/7/2019 (gbaS, COURT STAFF). |
Filing 5 Declaration of Elizabeth Sweeley re #1 Notice of Removal, by Blood Centers of the Pacific, Blood Systems. (McInerney, Thomas) (Filed on 8/7/2019) Modified on 8/7/2019 (gbaS, COURT STAFF). |
Filing 4 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Blood Centers of the Pacific, Blood Systems (McInerney, Thomas) (Filed on 8/7/2019) Modified on 8/8/2019 (gbaS, COURT STAFF). |
Filing 3 Certificate of Interested Entities by Blood Centers of the Pacific, Blood Systems (McInerney, Thomas) (Filed on 8/7/2019) Modified on 8/8/2019 (gbaS, COURT STAFF). |
Filing 2 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Joseph C. Spero. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 8/21/2019. (ajsS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/7/2019) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL of Civil Action from San Francisco County Superior Court. Their case number is CGC-19-574926. (Filing fee $400.00, receipt number 0971-13590044). Filed by Blood Centers of the Pacific, Blood Systems. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Civil Cover Sheet) (McInerney, Thomas) (Filed on 8/7/2019) Modified on 8/7/2019 (gbaS, COURT STAFF). |
Answer to Removed Complaint (See Doc No. #1 -2) by Blood Centers of the Pacific, Blood Systems. (gbaS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/7/2019) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.