Torres v. Pompeo
| Armando Torres |
| Michael Richard Pompeo, Secretary, U.S. State Department and Michael R. Pompeo |
| 3:2019cv04752 |
| August 13, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Joseph C Spero |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 13, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Armando Torres.. (Lal, Prerna) (Filed on 9/10/2019) |
| Filing 10 CLERK'S NOTICE Re: Consent or Declination: Plaintiff shall file a consent or declination to proceed before a magistrate judge. Note that any party is free to withhold consent to proceed before a magistrate judge without adverse substantive consequences. The forms are available at: http://cand.uscourts.gov/civilforms. Consent/Declination due by 9/24/2019. (tmiS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/10/2019) |
Filing 9
Order, signed 8/21/19, by Chief Magistrate Judge Joseph C. Spero granting #1 Motion for Pro Hac Vice for Prerna Lal.(klhS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/21/2019)
|
| Filing 8 Summons Issued as to Michael R. Pompeo. (gbaS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/15/2019) |
| Filing 7 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Case Management Statement due by 11/8/2019. Initial Case Management Conference set for 11/15/2019 02:00 PM in San Francisco, Courtroom G, 15th Floor. (gbaS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/15/2019) |
| Filing 6 Notice of Additional Parties: the following parties are listed on #2 Complaint, and have been added to this case: Lizbeth Jimenz Mateo. (This is a text-only entry.) (Lal, Prerna) (Filed on 8/15/2019) |
| Filing 5 Proposed Summons. (Lal, Prerna) (Filed on 8/15/2019) |
| Filing 4 Administrative Motion to File Exhibits Under Seal filed by Armando Torres. (Attachments: #1 Declaration, #2 Proposed Order, #3 Exhibit) (Lal, Prerna) (Filed on 8/14/2019) Modified on 8/15/2019 (gbaS, COURT STAFF). |
| Filing 3 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Joseph C. Spero. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 8/28/2019. (ajsS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/14/2019) |
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT for Declaratory and Injunctive Relief against Michael Richard Pompeo (Filing fee $ 400.00, receipt number 0971-13609201.). Filed by Armando Torres. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit)(Lal, Prerna) (Filed on 8/14/2019) Modified on 8/15/2019 (gbaS, COURT STAFF). |
| Filing 1 MOTION for leave to appear in Pro Hac Vice (Filing fee $ 310.00, receipt number 0971-13608153.) filed by Armando Torres. (Lal, Prerna) (Filed on 8/13/2019) Modified on 8/15/2019 (gbaS, COURT STAFF). |
| Filing 1 First MOTION for leave to appear in Pro Hac Vice ( Filing fee $ 310, receipt number 0971-13608153.) filed by Armando Torres. (Lal, Prerna) (Filed on 8/13/2019) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
