Veloro et al v. Monsanto Company et al
| Maribon Veloro and Percival Veloro |
| Wilbur-Ellis Company LLC, Monsanto Company and Wilbur-Ellis Feed, LLC |
| 3:2019cv05187 |
| August 20, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Vince Chhabria |
| Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 25, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 Notice of Withdrawal of Motion by Plaintiffs Percival Veloro and Maribon Veloro for Trial Preference (Robinson, Mark) (Filed on 9/25/2019) |
| ERRONEOUSLY E-FILED, DISREGARD - DUPLICATE ENTRY MEMBER CASE OPENED: re 3:16-md-02741-VC; Veloro v. Monsanto Company, Opened in California Northern District as 3:19-cv-05187 VC cc: JPMDL (fabS-adi, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/9/2019) Modified on 9/9/2019 (fabS, COURT STAFF). |
| MEMBER CASE OPENED: re 3:16-md-02741 VC; Veloro v. Monsanto Company, Opened in California Northern District as 3:19-cv-05187 VC cc: JPMDL (fabS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/6/2019) |
| Filing 8 MOTION Motion for Trial Preference Notice of Motion and Motion by Plaintiffs Percival Veloro and Maribon Veloro for Trial Preference filed by Maribon Veloro, Percival Veloro. Motion Hearing set for 10/10/2019 10:00 AM in San Francisco, Courtroom 04, 17th Floor before Judge Vince Chhabria. Responses due by 9/19/2019. Replies due by 9/26/2019. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Mark P. Robinson, Jr., #2 Exhibit 1 - Letter from Dr. Nademanee, #3 Exhibit 2 - Medical Records, #4 Exhibit 3 - Declaration of Dr. Nademanee)(Robinson, Mark) (Filed on 9/5/2019) |
| Filing 7 DEMAND for Trial by Jury by Maribon Veloro, Percival Veloro. (Robinson, Mark) (Filed on 8/23/2019) |
| Filing 6 Certificate of Interested Entities by Maribon Veloro, Percival Veloro (Robinson, Mark) (Filed on 8/23/2019) |
| Filing 5 Case assigned to Judge Vince Chhabria. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. (as, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/21/2019) |
| Filing 4 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Monsanto Company (Fayne, Samuel) (Filed on 8/20/2019) |
| Filing 3 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Monsanto Company identifying Corporate Parent Bayer AG for Monsanto Company. (Fayne, Samuel) (Filed on 8/20/2019) |
| Filing 2 Certificate of Interested Entities by Monsanto Company identifying Corporate Parent Bayer AG for Monsanto Company. (Fayne, Samuel) (Filed on 8/20/2019) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL of Veloro Case from Riverside Superior Court. Their case number is RIC1902257. (Filing fee $400 receipt number 0971-13627424). Filed byMonsanto Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit 5, #6 Exhibit 6, #7 Civil Cover Sheet)(Fayne, Samuel) (Filed on 8/20/2019) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
