Vincent v. City Of Oakland et al
| Mitchell Charles Vincent |
| Anne Kirkpatrick, #9189 A. Mann, #9617 M. Loyola, Oakland Police Department and City Of Oakland |
| 3:2019cv05357 |
| August 26, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| James Donato |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1343 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 26, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Notice: The assigned judge participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order No. 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras. Case Management Statement due by 11/28/2019. Initial Case Management Conference set for 12/5/2019 10:00 AM in San Francisco, Courtroom 11, 19th Floor. (Attachments: #1 Standing Order, #2 Notice of Eligibility for Video Recording)(jjbS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/26/2019) |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to City Of Oakland, Anne Kirkpatrick, M. Loyola, A. Mann, Oakland Police Department. (jjbS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/26/2019) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against City Of Oakland, Anne Kirkpatrick, M. Loyola, A. Mann, Oakland Police Department (Filing fee $ 400; Receipt # 44611016479). Filed by Mitchell Charles Vincent. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Receipt)(jjbS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/26/2019) Modified on 8/27/2019 (jjbS, COURT STAFF). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
