Rosenthal v. XTRA Lease, LLC
Bert Rosenthal |
XTRA Lease, LLC |
3:2019cv05428 |
August 29, 2019 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
Jacqueline Scott Corley |
P.I.: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 12, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Bert Rosenthal.. (McKague, Brett) (Filed on 9/12/2019) |
Filing 8 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by XTRA Lease, LLC.. (Rutherford, Luanne) (Filed on 9/11/2019) |
Filing 7 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by XTRA Lease, LLC (Rutherford, Luanne) (Filed on 9/11/2019) |
Filing 6 ANSWER to Complaint byXTRA Lease, LLC. (Rutherford, Luanne) (Filed on 9/5/2019) |
Filing 5 NOTICE by XTRA Lease, LLC re #1 Notice of Removal, Amended (Rutherford, Luanne) (Filed on 9/5/2019) |
Filing 4 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Case Management Statement due by 11/28/2019. Initial Case Management Conference set for 12/5/2019 01:30 PM in San Francisco, Courtroom F, 15th Floor. (slhS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/3/2019) |
Filing 3 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by XTRA Lease, LLC (Rutherford, Luanne) (Filed on 9/3/2019) |
#Electronic filing error Re: #1 Notice of Removal filed by XTRA Lease, LLC.; Complaint has not been filed as required by Fed.R.Civ.P 3. (slhS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/3/2019) |
Filing 2 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 9/13/2019. (as, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/30/2019) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Alameda County Superior Court. Their case number is RG19027166. (Filing fee $400 receipt number 0971-13659981). Filed by XTRA Lease, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Rutherford, Luanne) (Filed on 8/29/2019) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Rosenthal v. XTRA Lease, LLC | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: XTRA Lease, LLC | |
Represented By: | Luanne Rutherford |
Represented By: | Richard Dewey Wheeler |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Bert Rosenthal | |
Represented By: | Brett Lawrence McKague |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.