McCray v. Uber Technologies Inc.
| Angela McCray, Thomas Colopy and Angela McRay |
| Uber Technologies Inc. |
| 3:2019cv05723 |
| September 11, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Edward M Chen |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. § 2201 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 8, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 33 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Edward M. Chen: Initial Case Management Conference held on 10/8/2019. See pdf image for further details.Total Time in Court: 14 Minutes. Court Reporter: Not Reported. Plaintiff Attorney: Shannon Liss-Riordan (via Court Call). Defendant Attorney: Theane Evangelis. Attachment: Minute Order. (afmS, COURT STAFF) (Date Filed: 10/8/2019) |
| Filing 32 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Uber Technologies Inc.. Filed by Thomas Colopy. (Liss-Riordan, Shannon) (Filed on 10/8/2019) Modified on 10/8/2019 (amgS, COURT STAFF). |
| Filing 31 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Angela McRay (Tidrick, Steven) (Filed on 10/7/2019) |
| Filing 30 NOTICE of Appearance by Steven Gregory Tidrick (Tidrick, Steven) (Filed on 10/7/2019) |
Filing 29
Order by Judge Edward M. Chen granting #28 Motion to Appear by Telephone. Counsel shall make arrangements to appear through Court Call.(afmS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/7/2019)
|
| Filing 28 MOTION to Appear by Telephone and Proposed Order filed by Angela McCray. (Liss-Riordan, Shannon) (Filed on 10/7/2019) |
| Filing 27 CLERK'S NOTICE: Due to unavailability of the Court, Initial Case Management Conference set for 10/10/2019 is vacated and specially reset for 10/8/2019 09:30 AM in San Francisco, Courtroom 05, 17th Floor. The Court will discuss motion schedule with the parties at that time. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (afmS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/4/2019) |
| Filing 26 CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT (Joint Statement) filed by Uber Technologies Inc.. (Evangelis, Theane) (Filed on 10/3/2019) |
| Filing 25 MOTION to Appear by Telephone and Proposed Order filed by Angela McCray. (Liss-Riordan, Shannon) (Filed on 10/1/2019) |
| Filing 24 Case reassigned to Judge Edward M. Chen. Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers no longer assigned to the case. Notice: The assigned judge participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order No. 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras. (haS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/30/2019) |
| Filing 23 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Angela McCray re #21 Case Management Scheduling Order, (Liss-Riordan, Shannon) (Filed on 9/30/2019) |
|
Filing 22
ORDER RELATING CASE. Case related to 13-cv-3826-EMC. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 9/27/2019. (afmS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/30/2019)
|
|
Filing 21
CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE ORDER IN REASSIGNED CASE: Initial Case Management Conference set for 10/10/2019 09:30 AM in San Francisco, Courtroom 05, 17th Floor. Joint Case Management Statement due by 10/3/2019. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 9/30/2019. (afmS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/30/2019)
|
|
Filing 20
(DISREGARD - WRONG IMAGE. PLEASE SEE #22 ) ORDER RELATING CASE. Related to 3:13-cv-3826-EMC. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 9/27/2019. (afmS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/27/2019) Modified on 9/30/2019 (afmS, COURT STAFF).
|
| Filing 19 Response - Defendant Uber Technologies, Inc.'s Response to Angela McRay's Administrative Motion to Consider Whether to Relate Cases byUber Technologies Inc.. (Evangelis, Theane) (Filed on 9/27/2019) |
| Filing 18 CLERK'S NOTICE: Plaintiff in McRay v. Uber Technologies, Inc. (4:19-cv-05723) has filed a motion to relate the case to OConnor v. Uber Technologies, Inc. (3:13-cv-03826). Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 3-12, Defendant Uber Technologies, Inc. shall have the opportunity to respond. The response must specifically address the issues in Civil L.R. 3-12(a) and (d) and be served on all parties and lodged with the Chambers of all Judges identified in the motion. The response shall be filed by 12pm on Friday, September 27, 2019. Plaintiff to immediately notify Defendant of the opportunity to respond and the deadline by which to do so; proof of that notice shall be filed with this Court. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (afmS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/26/2019) |
|
Filing 17
ORDER [*AS MODIFIED BY THE COURT*] by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers granting #14 Stipulation to Extend Briefing Schedules and Set a Hearing Date.The Court notes that there is a pending motion to relate this case to O'Connor v. Uber Technologies, Inc. Case No. 3:13-cv-03826. If granted the parties will be required to reset the hearing schedule to Judge Chen's requirements. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/26/2019)
|
| Set/Reset Deadlines as to #5 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction . Responses due by 10/14/2019. Replies due by 10/29/2019. Motion Hearing set for 11/19/2019 02:00 PM in Oakland, Courtroom 1, 4th Floor before Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/26/2019) |
|
Filing 16
ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned using a proportionate, random, and blind system pursuant to General Order No. 44 to Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers for all further proceedings. Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu no longer assigned to case. Notice: The assigned judge participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order No. 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras.Signed by Clerk on 9/24/2019. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Eligibility for Video Recording)(jmlS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/24/2019)
|
| Filing 15 CLERK'S NOTICE OF IMPENDING REASSIGNMENT TO A U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE: The Clerk of this Court will now randomly reassign this case to a District Judge because either (1) a party has not consented to the jurisdiction of a Magistrate Judge, or (2) time is of the essence in deciding a pending judicial action for which the necessary consents to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction have not been secured. You will be informed by separate notice of the district judge to whom this case is reassigned. ALL HEARING DATES PRESENTLY SCHEDULED BEFORE THE CURRENT MAGISTRATE JUDGE ARE VACATED AND SHOULD BE RE-NOTICED FOR HEARING BEFORE THE JUDGE TO WHOM THIS CASE IS REASSIGNED. This is a text only docket entry; there is no document associated with this notice. (ig, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/23/2019) |
| Filing 14 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER TO EXTEND BRIEFING SCHEDULES AND SET A HEARING DATE filed by Uber Technologies Inc. and Angela McCray. (Evangelis, Theane) (Filed on 9/23/2019) Modified on 9/24/2019 (jmlS, COURT STAFF). |
| Filing 13 Certificate of Interested Entities by Uber Technologies Inc. identifying Other Affiliate SoftBank Group Corp., Other Affiliate SB Cayman 2 Ltd. for Uber Technologies Inc.. (Evangelis, Theane) (Filed on 9/20/2019) |
| Filing 12 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Uber Technologies Inc... (Evangelis, Theane) (Filed on 9/20/2019) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE of Appearance by Theane Evangelis (Evangelis, Theane) (Filed on 9/20/2019) |
| Set/Reset Deadlines as to #5 Motion for Preliminary Injunction . Motion Hearing set for 10/24/2019 01:00 PM in Oakland, Courtroom 4, 3rd Floor before Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu. (ig, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/18/2019) |
| Filing 10 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Angela McCray.. (Liss-Riordan, Shannon) (Filed on 9/18/2019) |
| Filing 9 Renotice motion hearing re #5 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction filed byAngela McCray. (Related document(s) #5 ) (Liss-Riordan, Shannon) (Filed on 9/18/2019) |
| Filing 8 CLERK'S NOTICE TO PLAINTIFF Re: Consent or Declination: Plaintiff shall file a consent or declination to proceed before a magistrate judge. Note that any party is free to withhold consent to proceed before a magistrate judge without adverse substantive consequences. The forms are available at: http://cand.uscourts.gov/civilforms. Consent/Declination due by 9/24/2019. (ig, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/17/2019). |
| Filing 7 CLERK'S NOTICE: Plaintiff's Motion for Preliminary Injunction #5 was not noticed for hearing on Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu's calendar. Plaintiff shall notice (not re-file) the motion for a hearing in compliance with Local Rule 7-2(a) and Judge Ryu's Standing Order. The briefing schedule remains in effect. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (ig, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/17/2019) |
| Filing 6 Summons Issued as to Uber Technologies Inc. (jmlS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/16/2019) |
| Filing 5 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction filed by Angela McCray. Responses due by 9/27/2019. Replies due by 10/4/2019. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Liss-Riordan, Shannon) (Filed on 9/13/2019) |
| Filing 4 Proposed Summons. (Liss-Riordan, Shannon) (Filed on 9/13/2019) |
| Filing 3 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: This case may fall within the Pilot Program for Initial Discovery Protocols for Employment Cases Alleging Adverse Action. See #General Order 71. Parties and Counsel are directed to review General Order 71 to determine whether it applies to this case, and to comply with that General Order if applicable. Case Management Statement due by 12 /11/2019. Initial Case Management Conference set for 12/18/2019 01:30 PM in Oakland, Courtroom 4, 3rd Floor. (jmlS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/12/2019) |
| #Electronic filing error. Incorrect event used. [err101] The correct event is Proposed Summons. The summons should NOT be filed as an attachment to the Complaint. The correct event can be found at Civil Events > Other Filings > Other Documents > Proposed Summons. Please re-file the SUMMONS ONLY in its entirety. Re:[1-2] Summons filed by Angela McCray (jmlS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/12/2019) |
| Filing 2 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 9/25/2019. (bwS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/11/2019) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Uber Technologies Inc. ( Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0971-13696326.). Filed byAngela McCray. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons)(Liss-Riordan, Shannon) (Filed on 9/11/2019) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
