Villarreal et al v. Ford Motor Company et al
Plaintiff: Robert Villarreal and Irma Villarreal
Defendant: Ford Motor Company, Haberfelde Ford, Inc. d/b/a Jim Burke Ford and Jim Burke Ford
Case Number: 3:2019cv05837
Filed: September 18, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Presiding Judge: Maxine M Chesney
Nature of Suit: Contract Product Liability
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Jury Demanded By: Both
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 28, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 28, 2020 Filing 21 Acknowledgement of Receipt from Santa Clara County Superior of #19 Remand Order. (gbaS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/28/2020)
January 10, 2020 Filing 20 Certified copies of #19 Remand Order and Docket Sheet sent to Santa Clara County Superior Court. (gbaS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/10/2020)
January 10, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 19 ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS' MOTION TO REMAND; REMANDING CASE TO STATE COURT; VACATING HEARING. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on January 10, 2020. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/10/2020)
January 2, 2020 Filing 18 REPLY (re #15 MOTION to Remand ) Plaintiff's Reply in Support of Motion to Remand filed byIrma Villarreal, Robert Villarreal. (Nguyen, Anh) (Filed on 1/2/2020)
December 27, 2019 Filing 17 OPPOSITION/RESPONSE (re #15 MOTION to Remand ) filed byJim Burke Ford, Ford Motor Company. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Counsel, #2 Exhibit A, Order in Covarrubias, #3 Exhibit B, Order in Perez, #4 Exhibit C, Claims List, #5 Exhibit D, Repairs, #6 Exhibit E, Order in ML02814, #7 Exhibit F, Invoice)(May, Richard) (Filed on 12/27/2019)
December 13, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 16 ORDER CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. In light of the pending Motion to Remand, the Initial Case Management Conference currently scheduled for December 20, 2019, is continued to February 21, 2020. A Joint Case Management Conference Statement shall be filed no later than February 14, 2020. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on December 13, 2019. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/13/2019)
December 13, 2019 Filing 15 NOTICE OF MOTION to Remand filed by Irma Villarreal, Robert Villarreal. Motion Hearing set for 1/17/2020 09:00 AM in San Francisco, Courtroom 07, 19th Floor before Judge Maxine M. Chesney. Responses due by 12/27/2019. Replies due by 1/3/2020. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum of Points and Authorities, #2 Declaration, #3 Exhibit 1, #4 Exhibit 2, #5 Proposed Order)(Nguyen, Anh) (Filed on 12/13/2019)
December 13, 2019 Set/Reset Deadlines:, Set/Reset Hearing re #16 Order, Joint Case Management Statement due by 2/14/2020. Initial Case Management Conference reset to 2/21/2020 at 10:30 AM in San Francisco, Courtroom 07, 19th Floor. (tlS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/13/2019)
December 11, 2019 Filing 14 Certificate of Interested Entities by Jim Burke Ford identifying Other Affiliate Dan Hay for Jim Burke Ford. (May, Richard) (Filed on 12/11/2019)
November 25, 2019 Filing 13 ADR Certification (ADR L.R. 3-5 b) of discussion of ADR options (Nguyen, Anh) (Filed on 11/25/2019)
November 13, 2019 Filing 12 ADR Certification (ADR L.R. 3-5 b) of discussion of ADR options (May, Richard) (Filed on 11/13/2019)
October 22, 2019 Filing 11 NOTICE of Appearance by Anh X Nguyen (Nguyen, Anh) (Filed on 10/22/2019)
October 11, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER DIRECTING DEFENDANTS TO SUBMIT CHAMBERS COPY OF NOTICE OF REMOVAL OF CIVIL ACTION UNDER 28 U.S.C. SECTION 1441(B) (DIVERSITY JURISDICTION). Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on October 11, 2019. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/11/2019)
October 4, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 9 CASE MANAGEMENT SCHEDULING ORDER: Initial Case Management Conference set for 12/20/2019 10:30 AM in San Francisco, Courtroom 07, 19th Floor. Joint Case Management Statement due by 12/13/2019.. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on 10/4/2019. (Attachments: #1 Standing Order for Judge Maxine M. Chesney, #2 Standing Order for All Judges)(tlS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/4/2019)
October 1, 2019 Filing 8 Case REASSIGNED to Judge Maxine M. Chesney. Notice: The assigned judge participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order No. 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras. Magistrate Judge Virginia K. DeMarchi no longer assigned to case. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Eligibility for Video Recording) (bwS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/1/2019)
October 1, 2019 Filing 7 This case will be randomly reassigned to a District Judge outside the San Jose Division pursuant to the Caseload Rebalancing Pilot Program approved by the Court effective March 1, 2018. For information, visit our web page at #http://cand.uscourts.gov/news/225. (bwS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/1/2019)
October 1, 2019 Filing 6 CLERK'S NOTICE OF IMPENDING REASSIGNMENT TO A U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE: The Clerk of this Court will now randomly reassign this case to a District Judge because either (1) a party has not consented to the jurisdiction of a Magistrate Judge, or (2) time is of the essence in deciding a pending judicial action for which the necessary consents to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction have not been secured. You will be informed by separate notice of the district judge to whom this case is reassigned. ALL HEARING DATES PRESENTLY SCHEDULED BEFORE THE CURRENT MAGISTRATE JUDGE ARE VACATED AND SHOULD BE RE-NOTICED FOR HEARING BEFORE THE JUDGE TO WHOM THIS CASE IS REASSIGNED. This is a text only docket entry; there is no document associated with this notice. (pmcS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/1/2019)
October 1, 2019 Filing 5 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Jim Burke Ford, Ford Motor Company.. (May, Richard) (Filed on 10/1/2019)
September 19, 2019 Filing 4 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Case Management Statement due by 12/10/2019. Initial Case Management Conference set for 12/17/2019 01:30 PM in San Jose, Courtroom 2, 5th Floor. (sfbS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/19/2019)
September 19, 2019 Filing 3 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Virginia K. DeMarchi. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 10/3/2019. (as, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/19/2019)
September 18, 2019 Filing 1 ANSWER to Complaint (Notice of Removal) by Jim Burke Ford, Ford Motor Company. (cv, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/18/2019) Modified on 9/19/2019 (cv, COURT STAFF).
September 18, 2019 Filing 2 Certificate of Interested Entities by Ford Motor Company identifying Corporate Parent State Street Corporation, Other Affiliate Evercore Trust Company, N.A., Other Affiliate The Vanguard Group, Other Affiliate Black Rock, Inc. for Ford Motor Company. re 1 Notice of Removal, (May, Richard) (Filed on 9/18/2019)
September 18, 2019 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Santa Clara Superior Court. Their case number is 19CV352990. (Filing fee $400 receipt number 0971-13716752). Filed byHaberfelde Ford, Inc. d/b/a Jim Burke Ford, Ford Motor Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Service of Process, #2 Exhibit B - Complaint, #3 Exhibit C - State Court Pleadings, #4 Exhibit D - Excerpts, #5 Civil Cover Sheet, #6 Declaration)(May, Richard) (Filed on 9/18/2019)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Villarreal et al v. Ford Motor Company et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ford Motor Company
Represented By: Richard James May
Represented By: Stephen H. Dye
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Haberfelde Ford, Inc. d/b/a Jim Burke Ford
Represented By: Richard James May
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jim Burke Ford
Represented By: Richard James May
Represented By: Stephen H. Dye
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Robert Villarreal
Represented By: Anh X Nguyen
Represented By: Tionna Grace Dolin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Irma Villarreal
Represented By: Anh X Nguyen
Represented By: Tionna Grace Dolin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?