Ekmekjian v. United States of America
| Garin L. Ekmekjian |
| United States of America |
| 5:2019cv05939 |
| September 23, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Nathanael M Cousins |
| Taxes |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 7402 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 15, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 SUMMONS Returned Executed United States of America served on 11/14/2019, answer due 1/13/2020. (sfbS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/15/2019) |
| Filing 8 Summons Issued as to United States of America, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (Attachments: #1 IRS USMS 285, #2 Attny Gen USMS 285, #3 US Attny USMS 285)(sfbS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/9/2019) |
Filing 7
ORDER GRANTING IFP APPLICATION; SCREENING COMPLAINT; ORDERING SERVICE. Re: Dkt. Nos. #1 , #2 . Signed by Judge Nathanael Cousins. (lmh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/7/2019)
|
| Filing 6 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Garin L. Ekmekjian.. (Spivey, Amy) (Filed on 10/3/2019) |
| Filing 5 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Case Management Statement due by 1/1/2020. Initial Case Management Conference set for 1/8/2020 10:00 AM in San Jose, Courtroom 5, 4th Floor. (sfbS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/24/2019) |
| Filing 4 Case assigned to Judge Nathanael M. Cousins. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 10/8/2019. (as, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/24/2019) |
| Filing 3 Proposed Summons. (Spivey, Amy) (Filed on 9/23/2019) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Garin L. Ekmekjian. (Spivey, Amy) (Filed on 9/23/2019) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against United States of America. Filed byGarin L. Ekmekjian. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Spivey, Amy) (Filed on 9/23/2019) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Ekmekjian v. United States of America | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Garin L. Ekmekjian | |
| Represented By: | Amy Nicole Spivey |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: United States of America | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
