Fosselman v. Jackson et al
| Jerome Fosselman |
| Correctinal Officer K. Jackson, D. Huynh, Correctional Officer D. January, Correctional Officer Stanson, Sergeant V. Baker, Warden Ron Davis and Correctional Officer Blurton |
| 3:2019cv06118 |
| September 26, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| PSLC MWD |
| Richard Seeborg |
| Prisoner: Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 5, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 Letter dated 10/2/2019 from Jerome Fosselman. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (gbaS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/9/2019) |
| Filing 4 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Jerome Fosselman. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (gbaS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/2/2019) |
| Filing 3 CLERK'S NOTICE: re completion of In Forma Pauperis affidavit or payment of filing fee due within 28 days. IFP Form due by 11/4/2019. (gbaS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/26/2019) |
| Filing 2 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Jerome Fosselman.. (gbaS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/26/2019) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Under the Prisoner Civil Rights Act; Demand for Jury Trial against V. Baker, Blurton, Ron Davis, D. Huynh, K. Jackson, D. January, Stanson (Filing fee IFPP). Filed by Jerome Fosselman. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (gbaS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/26/2019) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
