Nevarez et al v. City of San Francisco
| Abdul Nevarez and Priscilla Nevarez |
| City of San Francisco and Inclusive Does 1-10 |
| 3:2019cv06155 |
| September 27, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Sallie Kim |
| American with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 6, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
ORDER by Judge Sallie Kim granting #10 Stipulation. (sklc1S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/22/2019)
|
| Set/Reset Deadlines as to #9 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION TO DISMISS; MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES. Responses due by 12/4/2019. Replies due by 12/18/2019. Motion Hearing reset for 2/3/2020 09:30 AM in San Francisco, Courtroom C, 15th Floor before Magistrate Judge Sallie Kim. (mklS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/22/2019) |
| Filing 10 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER to Modify Hearing Date and Briefing Schedule for re #9 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION TO DISMISS; MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES, and General Order 56 Joint Site Inspection Deadline filed by Abdul Nevarez, Priscilla Nevarez. (Cabalo, Catherine) (Filed on 11/21/2019) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION TO DISMISS; MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES filed by City of San Francisco. Motion Hearing set for 1/6/2020 09:30 AM in San Francisco, Courtroom C, 15th Floor before Magistrate Judge Sallie Kim. Responses due by 11/27/2019. Replies due by 12/4/2019. (Attachments: #(1) [Proposed] Order)(Lakritz, Thomas) (Filed on 11/13/2019) |
| Filing 8 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by City of San Francisco.. (Lakritz, Thomas) (Filed on 11/13/2019) |
| Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Abdul Nevarez, Priscilla Nevarez. City of San Francisco served on 10/23/2019, answer due 11/13/2019. (Cabalo, Catherine) (Filed on 11/13/2019) |
| Filing 6 Summons Issued as to Defendant City of San Francisco. (tnS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/3/2019) |
| Filing 5 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Abdul Nevarez, Priscilla Nevarez.. (Cabalo, Catherine) (Filed on 10/2/2019) |
| Filing 4 Proposed Summons. (Cabalo, Catherine) (Filed on 10/2/2019) |
| Filing 3 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order for Cases Asserting Denial of Right of Access under Americans with Disabilities Act. (tnS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/1/2019) |
| Filing 2 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Sallie Kim. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 10/15/2019. (as, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/30/2019) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Declaratory and Injunctive Relief and Damages against Defendant City of San Francisco, (Filing Fee: $400.00, receipt number 0971-13746214). Filed by Abdul Nevarez, Priscilla Nevarez. (Attachments: #(1) Civil Cover Sheet)(Cabalo, Catherine) (Filed on 9/27/2019) Modified on 10/1/2019 (tnS, COURT STAFF). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
