Bonilla v. White et al
| Steven Wayne Bonilla |
| Vince G. Chhabria, Howard R. Lloyd, Jeffrey S. White, Claudia Wilken, Beth Labson Freeman, Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers and Richard Seeborg |
| 3:2019cv06299 |
| October 2, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Vince Chhabria |
| PSLC RMH |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 31, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge Vince Chhabria on 10/31/2019. The deputy clerk hereby certifies that on 10/31/2019 a copy of this order was served by sending it via first-class mail to the address of each non-CM/ECF user listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing. (knm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/31/2019)
|
| Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Steven Wayne Bonilla. (fabS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/21/2019) |
| Filing 2 CLERK'S NOTICE re completion of In Forma Pauperis affidavit or payment of filing fee due within 28 days. IFP Form due by 11/12/2019. (fabS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/2/2019) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Vince G. Chhabria, Beth Labson Freeman, Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers, Howard R. Lloyd, Richard Seeborg, Jeffrey S. White, Claudia Wilken. Filed bySteven Wayne Bonilla. (fabS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/2/2019) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
