Geerds v. San Francisco Bay View Inc.
Plaintiff: Joregen Geerds
Defendant: San Francisco Bay View Inc.
Case Number: 3:2019cv06465
Filed: October 8, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Presiding Judge: James Donato
Nature of Suit: Copyright
Cause of Action: 17 U.S.C. ยง 101
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
RSS RSS Track this Docket
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 28, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 4, 2019 Filing 12 NOTICE of Appearance by Gregory Peter Goonan as Local Counsel on behalf of Plaintiff (Goonan, Gregory) (Filed on 12/4/2019)
December 3, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 11 CASE MANAGEMENT SCHEDULING ORDER: Initial Case Management Conference set for 1/2/2020 10:00 AM in San Francisco, Courtroom 11, 19th Floor. Case Management Statement due by 12/26/2019. Signed by Judge James Donato on 12/3/19. (lrcS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/3/2019)
December 2, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned using a proportionate, random, and blind system pursuant to General Order No. 44 to Judge James Donato for all further proceedings. Notice: The assigned judge participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order No. 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras. Magistrate Judge Susan van Keulen no longer assigned to case. Reassignment Order signed by Clerk on 12/2/2019. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Eligibility for Video Recording)(bwS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/2/2019)
December 2, 2019 Filing 9 CLERK'S NOTICE OF IMPENDING REASSIGNMENT TO A U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE: The Clerk of this Court will now randomly reassign this case to a District Judge because either (1) a party has not consented to the jurisdiction of a Magistrate Judge, or (2) time is of the essence in deciding a pending judicial action for which the necessary consents to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction have not been secured. You will be informed by separate notice of the district judge to whom this case is reassigned. ALL HEARING DATES PRESENTLY SCHEDULED BEFORE THE CURRENT MAGISTRATE JUDGE ARE VACATED AND SHOULD BE RE-NOTICED FOR HEARING BEFORE THE JUDGE TO WHOM THIS CASE IS REASSIGNED. This is a text only docket entry; there is no document associated with this notice. (cfeS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/2/2019)
November 28, 2019 Filing 8 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Joregen Geerds.. (Liebowitz, Richard) (Filed on 11/28/2019)
November 22, 2019 Filing 7 CLERK'S NOTICE Re: Consent or Declination: Plaintiff Joregen Geerds shall file a consent or declination to proceed before a magistrate judge. Note that any party is free to withhold consent to proceed before a magistrate judge without adverse substantive consequences. The forms are available at: http://cand.uscourts.gov/civilforms. Consent/Declination due by 12/6/2019 (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (cfeS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/22/2019)
October 17, 2019 Filing 6 MOTION for leave to appear in Pro Hac Vice ( Filing fee $ 310, receipt number 0971-13803785.) filed by Joregen Geerds. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Good Standing, #2 Notice)(Liebowitz, Richard) (Filed on 10/17/2019)
October 10, 2019 Filing 5 Summons Issued as to San Francisco Bay View Inc.. (bwS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/10/2019)
October 10, 2019 Filing 4 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Case Management Statement due by 12/31/2019. Initial Case Management Conference set for 1/7/2019 09:30 AM in San Jose, Courtroom 6, 4th Floor. (bwS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/10/2019)
October 9, 2019 Filing 3 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Susan van Keulen. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 10/23/2019. (haS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/9/2019)
October 8, 2019 Filing 2 Proposed Summons. (Liebowitz, Richard) (Filed on 10/8/2019)
October 8, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against San Francisco Bay View Inc. ( Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0971-13776627.). Filed byJoregen Geerds. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Civil Cover Sheet, #4 Copyright Form)(Liebowitz, Richard) (Filed on 10/8/2019)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Geerds v. San Francisco Bay View Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: San Francisco Bay View Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Joregen Geerds
Represented By: Richard P Liebowitz
Represented By: Gregory Peter Goonan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?