Lee v. South of Market Health Center et al
| Dr Gwen Rowe Lee |
| South of Market Health Center and CEO Charles E Range |
| 3:2019cv06482 |
| October 9, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Laurel Beeler |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 451 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 19, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
CLERK'S NOTICE RESETTING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE: Initial Case Management Conference previously set for 1/9/2020 is reset to 1/16/2020 at 11:00 AM in San Francisco, Courtroom B, 15th Floor. Case Management Statement due by 1/9/2020. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (ejkS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/8/2019)
|
|
Filing 7
CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Gwen Rowe Lee.. (Smith, Sandra) (Filed on 11/5/2019)
|
|
Filing 6
CLERK'S NOTICE Re: Consent or Declination: Plaintiffs shall file a consent or declination to proceed before a magistrate judge. Note that any party is free to withhold consent to proceed before a magistrate judge without adverse substantive consequences. The forms are available at: http://cand.uscourts.gov/civilforms. Consent/Declination due by 11/7/2019. (ejkS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/24/2019)
|
|
Filing 5
Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: This case may fall within the Pilot Program for Initial Discovery Protocols for Employment Cases Alleging Adverse Action. See #General Order 71. Parties and Counsel are directed to review General Order 71 to determine whether it applies to this case, and to comply with that General Order if applicable. Case Management Statement due by 1/ 2/2020. Initial Case Management Conference set for 1/9/2020 11:00 AM in San Francisco, Courtroom B, 15th Floor. (fabS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/10/2019)
|
|
Filing 4
Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 10/23/2019. (ajsS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/9/2019)
|
|
Filing 3
Civil Cover Sheet by Gwen Rowe Lee . (Smith, Sandra) (Filed on 10/9/2019)
|
|
Filing 2
***INCORRECT DOCUMENT ATTACHED, REFILED AT DKT. #3 ***Civil Cover Sheet by Gwen Rowe Lee . (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Smith, Sandra) (Filed on 10/9/2019) Modified on 10/9/2019 (ajsS, COURT STAFF).
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT for Employment Discrimination against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0971-13779157.). Filed byGwen Rowe Lee. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Notice of Right to Sue)(Smith, Sandra) (Filed on 10/9/2019)
|
|
#Electronic filing error. Civil Cover Sheet missing. No judge assignment will be made until the document is e-filed. Submit your document using Civil Events > Other Filin gs > Other Documents > Civil Cover Sheet (ajsS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/9/2019)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
