Johnson v. Parisi et al
| Scott Johnson |
| Mark Setzen, Katkanok Rattakool, Lynee R. Frank, Scott R. Frank, Kevin Cullinane and Tiziana Parisi |
| 3:2019cv06505 |
| October 9, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| William H Orrick |
| American with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 12, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 14 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Scott Johnson. Scott R. Frank served on 11/7/2019, answer due 11/29/2019. (Seabock, Amanda) (Filed on 12/2/2019) |
| Filing 13 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Scott Johnson. Tiziana Parisi served on 11/7/2019, answer due 11/29/2019. (Seabock, Amanda) (Filed on 12/2/2019) |
| Filing 12 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed filed by Scott Johnson. Service waived by Lynee R. Frank waiver sent on 11/11/2019, answer due 1/10/2020. (Seabock, Amanda) (Filed on 11/25/2019) |
Filing 11
Order by Judge William H. Orrick granting #10 Stipulation to Extend Time for Defendants to Respond to Complaint. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/15/2019)
|
| Filing 10 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER to Extend time for Defendants to Respond to Complaint filed by Kevin Cullinane, Lynee R. Frank, Scott R. Frank, Tiziana Parisi, Mark Setzen. (McConathy, Michael) (Filed on 11/12/2019) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Michael David McConathy (McConathy, Michael) (Filed on 11/12/2019) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE by Scott Johnson of Acknowledgement and receipt of Summons and Complaint (Ballister, Raymond) (Filed on 11/11/2019) |
| Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Scott Johnson. Kevin Cullinane served on 10/19/2019, answer due 11/12/2019. (Seabock, Amanda) (Filed on 10/29/2019) |
| Filing 6 Summons Issued as to Kevin Cullinane, Lynee R. Frank, Scott R. Frank, Tiziana Parisi, Katkanok Rattakool, Mark Setzen. (aaaS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/10/2019) |
| Filing 5 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order for Cases Asserting Denial of Right of Access under Americans with Disabilities Act. Signed by Clerk on 10/10/19. (aaaS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/10/2019) |
| Filing 4 Case assigned to Judge William H. Orrick. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. (haS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/10/2019) |
| Filing 3 Proposed Summons. (Seabock, Amanda) (Filed on 10/9/2019) |
| Filing 2 Certificate of Interested Entities by Scott Johnson re #1 Complaint (Seabock, Amanda) (Filed on 10/9/2019) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES AND INJUNCTIVE RELIEF FOR VIOLATIONS OF: American's with Disabilities Act; Unruh Civil Rights Act; against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0971-13780735.). Filed byScott Johnson. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Seabock, Amanda) (Filed on 10/9/2019) Modified on 10/10/2019 (aaaS, COURT STAFF). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
