Valladares v. Checkr, Inc.
| Ricardo Valladares |
| Checkr, Inc. |
| 3:2019cv06558 |
| October 11, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Sallie Kim |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1681 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 25, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed filed by Ricardo Valladares. Service waived by Checkr, Inc. waiver sent on 10/25/2019, answer due 12/24/2019. (Heath, Erika) (Filed on 10/25/2019) |
| Set/Reset Hearing Initial Case Management Conference set for 1/13/2020 01:30 PM in San Francisco, Courtroom C, 15th Floor. (mklS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/24/2019) |
| Filing 6 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Ricardo Valladares.. (Heath, Erika) (Filed on 10/23/2019) |
| Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Defendant Checkr, Inc.. (tnS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/16/2019) |
| Filing 4 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Joint Case Management Statement due by 1/6/2020. Initial Case Management Conference set for 1/13/2020 at 1:30 PM in San Francisco, Courtroom C, 15th Floor. (tnS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/16/2019) Modified on 10/24/2019 (mklS, COURT STAFF). |
| Filing 3 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Sallie Kim. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 10/29/2019. (haS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/15/2019) |
| Filing 2 Proposed Summons. (Heath, Erika) (Filed on 10/11/2019) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Violation of Fair Credit Reporting Act and The California Investigative Consumer Reporting Agencies Act; Demand for Jury Trial against Defendant Checkr, Inc., (Filing Fee: $400.00, receipt number 0971-13787999). Filed by Ricardo Valladares. (Attachments: #(1) Civil Cover Sheet)(Heath, Erika) (Filed on 10/11/2019) Modified on 10/16/2019 (tnS, COURT STAFF). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Valladares v. Checkr, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Checkr, Inc. | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Ricardo Valladares | |
| Represented By: | Erika Angelos Heath |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
