STOCKLAND v. MONSANTO COMPANY
| WILBUR STOCKLAND |
| Monsanto Company |
| 3:2019cv06943 |
| October 28, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Vince Chhabria |
| Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 12, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 ANSWER to Complaint with jury demand byMonsanto Company. (Hollingsworth, Joe) (Filed on 12/12/2019) |
| Filing 10 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Monsanto Company identifying Other Affiliate Bayer AG for Monsanto Company. (Hollingsworth, Joe) (Filed on 12/12/2019) |
| Filing 9 Certificate of Interested Entities by Monsanto Company identifying Other Affiliate Bayer AG for Monsanto Company. (Hollingsworth, Joe) (Filed on 12/12/2019) |
| Filing 8 Case transferred in from District of Florida Northern; Case Number 3:19-cv-03321. Original file certified copy of transfer order and docket sheet received. |
| MEMBER CASE OPENED: re 3:16-md-02741 VC; Northern District of Florida (Pensacola), 3:19-cv-03321 TKW HTC, Stockland v. Monsanto Company, Opened in California Northern District as 3:19-cv-06943 VC pursuant to Conditional Transfer Order 159 cc: JPMDL (fabS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/28/2019) |
| Filing 7 CERTIFIED CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER (CTO 159) re MDL 2741 to the Northern District of California. (Attachments: #1 Email request) (alb) |
| Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by WILBUR STOCKLAND. MONSANTO COMPANY served on 9/30/2019, answer due 10/21/2019. (MORGAN, TIMOTHY) |
| Filing 5 Amended Summons Issued as to MONSANTO COMPANY. (alb) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Amended Proposed Summons by WILBUR STOCKLAND re #3 Summons Issued (MORGAN, TIMOTHY) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to MONSANTO COMPANY. (alb) |
| Filing 2 DOCKET ANNOTATION BY COURT: The parties in the above-referenced case were added to the docket incorrectly and will be corrected by the clerk. Party names are to be entered in all caps and without punctuation. For future reference: Please review the procedure for adding/creating new parties in the "Style Guide for Electronic Case Filing" and/or chapter 10 of the "CM/ECF Attorney User's Guide," available at www.flnd.uscourts.gov. (alb) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against MONSANTO COMPANY ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number AFLNDC-4603183.), filed by Wilbur Stockland. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons) (MORGAN, TIMOTHY) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: STOCKLAND v. MONSANTO COMPANY | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: WILBUR STOCKLAND | |
| Represented By: | TIMOTHY MICHAEL MORGAN |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Monsanto Company | |
| Represented By: | Joe G. Hollingsworth |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
