Lamatrice v. Monsanto Company
Plaintiff: Ray Lamatrice
Defendant: Monsanto Company
Case Number: 3:2019cv06959
Filed: October 24, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Presiding Judge: Vince Chhabria
Nature of Suit: Personal Inj. Prod. Liability
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Both
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 18, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 18, 2019 Filing 11 ANSWER to Complaint with jury demand byMonsanto Company. (Hollingsworth, Joe) (Filed on 11/18/2019)
November 18, 2019 Filing 10 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Monsanto Company identifying Other Affiliate Bayer AG for Monsanto Company. (Hollingsworth, Joe) (Filed on 11/18/2019)
November 18, 2019 Filing 9 Certificate of Interested Entities by Monsanto Company identifying Other Affiliate Bayer AG for Monsanto Company. (Hollingsworth, Joe) (Filed on 11/18/2019)
October 24, 2019 Filing 8 CASE TRANSFERRED in from United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida (Ft. Myers)e; Case Number 2:19-cv-00721-SPC-NPM. Original File Certified Copy of Transfer Order and Docket Sheet Received.
October 24, 2019 MEMBER CASE OPENED: USDC, Middle District of Florida (Ft. Myers), 2:19-cv-00721-SPC-NPM, Ray Lamatrice -v Monsanto Company, Opened in California Northern District as 3:19-cv-06959-VC pursuant to Conditional Transfer Order (CTO-158), MDL No. 2741 cc: JPMDL (tnS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/24/2019)
October 15, 2019 Filing 7 INTERESTED PERSONS ORDER Certificate of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement due by 10/29/2019. Signed by All Divisional Judges on 10/15/2019. (WRW)
October 15, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 6 RELATED CASE ORDER AND NOTICE of designation under Local Rule 3.05 - track 2. Notice of pendency of other actions due by 10/29/2019. Signed by Judge Sheri Polster Chappell on 10/15/2019. (WRW)
October 7, 2019 Filing 5 POSSIBLE MDL Tag Along case for MDL. Information emailed to MDL Panel on 10/7/19, including cover letter, copy of complaint, and docket sheet. (Attachments: #1 Docket Sheet, #2 Complaint) (drn)
October 7, 2019 Filing 4 STANDING ORDER: Filing of documents that exceed twenty-five pages. Signed by All Divisional Judges on 10/7/2019. (drn)
October 7, 2019 Filing 3 SUMMONS issued as to Monsanto Company. (drn)
October 4, 2019 Filing 2 NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Judge Sheri Polster Chappell and Magistrate Judge Nicholas P. Mizell. New case number: 2:19-cv-721-FtM-38NPM. (SJB)
October 4, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Monsanto Company against Ray Lamatrice with Jury Demand (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 113A-15995392) filed by Ray Lamatrice. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons)(Smith, Christopher)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Lamatrice v. Monsanto Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Ray Lamatrice
Represented By: Christopher D. Smith
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Monsanto Company
Represented By: Joe G. Hollingsworth
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?