Tamkin v. Zoho Corporation
Plaintiff: Tricia Tamkin
Defendant: Zoho Corporation
Case Number: 4:2019cv07465
Filed: November 13, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Presiding Judge: Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers
Referring Judge: Kandis A Westmore
Nature of Suit: P.I.: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
RSS RSS Track this Docket
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 10, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 10, 2020 Filing 26 CLERK'S NOTICE re Remand to California Superior Court, County of Alameda. (jmlS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/10/2020)
January 9, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 25 ORDER by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers granting #7 Motion to Remand ; Dismissing State Common Law Copyright Claim. Court GRANTS plaintiff's motion to remand this action to the California Superior Court, County of Alameda. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/9/2020)
January 7, 2020 Filing 24 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers: Motion Hearing held on 1/7/2020 re #7 MOTION to Remand the Case to Originating State Court filed by Tricia Tamkin, #9 MOTION to Dismiss Under Rule 12(b)(6) filed by Zoho Corporation. Total Time in Court: 07 minutes. Court Reporter: Pam Hebel. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Date Filed: 1/7/2020)
December 17, 2019 Filing 23 REPLY (re #9 MOTION to Dismiss Under Rule 12(b)(6) ) filed byZoho Corporation. (Marton, Ryan) (Filed on 12/17/2019)
December 13, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 22 ORDER by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers granting #19 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply re #9 MOTION to Dismiss Under Rule 12(b)(6). Responses due by 12/10/2019. Replies due by 12/17/2019. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/13/2019)
December 12, 2019 Filing 21 REPLY (re #7 MOTION to Remand the Case to Originating State Court ) filed byTricia Tamkin. (Morgan, Donna Burgundy) (Filed on 12/12/2019)
December 11, 2019 Filing 20 CLERK'S NOTICE SETTING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. Case Management Statement due by 2/3/2020. Initial Case Management Conference set for Monday, 2/10/2020 02:00 PM before Hon. Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers in Oakland, Courtroom 1, 4th Floor. (Attachments: #1 Standing Order) (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/11/2019)
December 11, 2019 Filing 19 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #9 MOTION to Dismiss Under Rule 12(b)(6) filed by Tricia Tamkin. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of D. Burgundy Morgan, #2 Proposed Order)(Morgan, Donna Burgundy) (Filed on 12/11/2019)
December 10, 2019 Filing 18 OPPOSITION/RESPONSE (re #9 MOTION to Dismiss Under Rule 12(b)(6) ) ; and Alternatively, for Leave to Amend filed byTricia Tamkin. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Tricia Tamkin, #2 Exhibit A to Tricia Tamkin Declaration, #3 Exhibit B to Tricia Tamkin Declaration, #4 Proposed Order)(Morgan, Donna Burgundy) (Filed on 12/10/2019)
December 5, 2019 Filing 17 OPPOSITION/RESPONSE (re #7 MOTION to Remand the Case to Originating State Court ) filed byZoho Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Marton, Ryan) (Filed on 12/5/2019)
December 4, 2019 (see dkt. #15 ). Set/Reset Deadlines as to #7 MOTION to Remand the Case to Originating State Court. Motion Hearing set for 1/7/2020 at 02:00 PM in Oakland, Courtroom 1, 4th Floor before Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers. (cpS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/4/2019)
December 3, 2019 Filing 16 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Zoho Corporation (Marton, Ryan) (Filed on 12/3/2019)
December 3, 2019 Filing 15 RE-NOTICE OF MOTION RE #7 MOTION to Remand the Case to Originating State Court (Morgan, Donna Burgundy) (Filed on 12/3/2019) Modified on 12/4/2019 (cpS, COURT STAFF).
December 3, 2019 (see dkt. #14 ). Set/Reset Deadlines as to #9 MOTION to Dismiss Under Rule 12(b)(6). Motion Hearing set for 1/7/2020 at 02:00 PM in Oakland, Courtroom 1, 4th Floor before Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers. (cpS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/3/2019)
December 2, 2019 Filing 14 RE-NOTICE MOTION re #9 MOTION to Dismiss Under Rule 12(b)(6) by Zoho Corporation (Marton, Ryan) (Filed on 12/2/2019) Modified on 12/3/2019 (cpS, COURT STAFF).
November 29, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 13 ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned using a proportionate, random, and blind system pursuant to General Order No. 44 to Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers for all further proceedings. Magistrate Judge Kandis A. Westmore no longer assigned to case. Notice: The assigned judge participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order No. 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras. Signed by the Clerk on November 29, 2019. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Eligibility for Video Recording)(cjlS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/29/2019)
November 27, 2019 Filing 12 CLERK'S NOTICE OF IMPENDING REASSIGNMENT TO A U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE: The Clerk of this Court will now reassign this case to a District Judge because time is of the essence in deciding a pending judicial action for which the necessary consents to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction have not been secured. You will be informed by separate notice of the district judge to whom this case is reassigned. ALL HEARING DATES PRESENTLY SCHEDULED BEFORE THE CURRENT MAGISTRATE JUDGE ARE VACATED AND SHOULD BE RE-NOTICED FOR HEARING BEFORE THE JUDGE TO WHOM THIS CASE IS REASSIGNED. This is a text only docket entry; there is no document associated with this notice. (shyS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/27/2019)
November 27, 2019 Filing 11 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Zoho Corporation.. (Marton, Ryan) (Filed on 11/27/2019)
November 26, 2019 Filing 10 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Tricia Tamkin.. (Morgan, Donna Burgundy) (Filed on 11/26/2019)
November 25, 2019 Filing 9 MOTION to Dismiss Under Rule 12(b)(6) filed by Zoho Corporation. Motion Hearing set for 1/16/2020 01:30 PM before Magistrate Judge Kandis A. Westmore. Responses due by 12/9/2019. Replies due by 12/16/2019. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Proposed Order)(Marton, Ryan) (Filed on 11/25/2019)
November 22, 2019 Filing 8 CLERK'S NOTICE TO PLAINTIFF AND DEFENDANT Re: Consent or Declination. Plaintiff/Defendant shall file a consent or declination to proceed before a magistrate judge by 11/29/2019. Note that any party is free to withhold consent to proceed before a magistrate judge without adverse substantive consequences. The forms are available at: http://cand.uscourts.gov/civilforms. (shyS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/22/2019)
November 21, 2019 Filing 7 MOTION to Remand the Case to Originating State Court filed by Tricia Tamkin. Motion Hearing set for 1/16/2019 01:30 PM before Magistrate Judge Kandis A. Westmore. Responses due by 12/5/2019. Replies due by 12/12/2019. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Tricia Tamkin, #2 Proposed Order)(Morgan, Donna Burgundy) (Filed on 11/21/2019)
November 14, 2019 Filing 6 Certificate of Interested Entities by Zoho Corporation identifying Corporate Parent Zoho Corporation Private Limited for Zoho Corporation. (Marton, Ryan) (Filed on 11/14/2019)
November 14, 2019 Filing 5 AMENDED NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Zoho Corporation (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Marton, Ryan) (Filed on 11/14/2019) Modified on 11/15/2019 (jjbS, COURT STAFF).
November 13, 2019 Filing 4 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Case Management Statement due by 2/4/2020. Initial Case Management Conference set for 2/11/2020 01:30 PM. (jjbS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/13/2019)
November 13, 2019 Filing 3 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Kandis A. Westmore. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 11/27/2019. (mbcS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/13/2019)
November 13, 2019 Filing 2 NOTICE of Withdrawal of Notice of Removal by Zoho Corporation re #1 Notice of Removal, (Marton, Ryan) (Filed on 11/13/2019) Modified on 11/14/2019 (jjbS, COURT STAFF).
November 13, 2019 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Superior Court of Alameda County State of California. Their case number is RG19040983. (Filing fee $400 receipt number 0971-13884994). Filed byZoho Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit Exhibit C, #4 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet)(Marton, Ryan) (Filed on 11/13/2019)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Tamkin v. Zoho Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Zoho Corporation
Represented By: Ryan J. Marton
Represented By: Lauren Estelle Whittemore
Represented By: Phillip John Haack
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Tricia Tamkin
Represented By: Donna Burgundy Morgan
Represented By: Deepali Apurva Brahmbhatt
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?