Cisco Systems, Inc. et al v. Mushkin, Inc. et al
Cisco Systems, Inc. and Cisco Technology, Inc. |
Jeffrey Ramey, Mushkin, Inc. and Mushkin, Inc. doing business as Enhanced Network Systems |
4:2019cv07514 |
November 14, 2019 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
Saundra Brown Armstrong |
Other Fraud |
28 U.S.C. § 1332 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 4, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 18 STIPULATION to Extend Time for Defendants Jeffrey Ramey and Mushkin (ENS) to Answer or Respond to Complaint Pursuant to Civil L.R. 6-1(a) re #1 Complaint filed by Jeffrey Ramey, Cisco Technology, Inc., Cisco Systems, Inc., and Mushkin, Inc. (Owens, Justin) (Filed on 12/4/2019) Modified on 12/5/2019 (jmlS, COURT STAFF). |
Filing 17 Certificate of Interested Entities by Jeffrey Ramey (Owens, Justin) (Filed on 12/4/2019) |
Filing 16 NOTICE of Appearance by Justin Nathanael Owens for Defendant Jeffrey Ramey (Owens, Justin) (Filed on 12/4/2019) |
Filing 15 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Cisco Systems, Inc., Cisco Technology, Inc. re #14 Order,, Set Deadlines/Hearings, (Hewitt, Michael) (Filed on 11/26/2019) |
Filing 14 CASE MANAGEMENT SCHEDULING ORDER FOR REASSIGNED CIVIL CASE. Joint Case Management Statement due by 2/13/2020. Telephonic Case Management Conference set for 2/20/2020 02:30 PM. Signed by Judge Saundra Brown Armstrong on 11/25/19. (dtmS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/25/2019) |
Filing 13 ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned using a proportionate, random, and blind system pursuant to General Order No. 44 to Judge Saundra Brown Armstrong for all further proceedings. (cv, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/25/2019) |
Filing 12 This case will be randomly/reassigned to a District Judge outside the San Jose Division pursuant to the Caseload Rebalancing Pilot Program approved by the Court effective March 1, 2018. For information, visit our web page at #http://cand.uscourts.gov/news/225. (cv, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/25/2019) |
Filing 11 CLERK'S NOTICE OF IMPENDING REASSIGNMENT TO A U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE: The Clerk of this Court will now randomly reassign this case to a District Judge because either (1) a party has not consented to the jurisdiction of a Magistrate Judge, or (2) time is of the essence in deciding a pending judicial action for which the necessary consents to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction have not been secured. You will be informed by separate notice of the district judge to whom this case is reassigned. ALL HEARING DATES PRESENTLY SCHEDULED BEFORE THE CURRENT MAGISTRATE JUDGE ARE VACATED AND SHOULD BE RE-NOTICED FOR HEARING BEFORE THE JUDGE TO WHOM THIS CASE IS REASSIGNED. This is a text only docket entry; there is no document associated with this notice. (cfeS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/25/2019) |
Filing 10 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Cisco Systems, Inc., Cisco Technology, Inc... (Heaton, Lyndsey) (Filed on 11/22/2019) |
Filing 9 CLERK'S NOTICE Re: Consent or Declination: Plaintiffs Cisco Systems, Inc.Cisco Technology, Inc. shall file a consent or declination to proceed before a magistrate judge. Note that any party is free to withhold consent to proceed before a magistrate judge without adverse substantive consequences. The forms are available at: http://cand.uscourts.gov/civilforms. Consent/Declination due by 12/6/2019. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (cfeS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/22/2019) |
Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Cisco Systems, Inc., Cisco Technology, Inc.. Jeffrey Ramey served on 11/19/2019, answer due 12/10/2019. (Hallam, Jeffrey) (Filed on 11/22/2019) |
Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Cisco Systems, Inc., Cisco Technology, Inc.. Mushkin, Inc. served on 11/18/2019, answer due 12/9/2019. (Hallam, Jeffrey) (Filed on 11/22/2019) |
Filing 6 Summons Issued as to Mushkin, Inc., Jeffrey Ramey. (cv, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/15/2019) |
Filing 5 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Case Management Statement due by 2/11/2020. Initial Case Management Conference set for 2/18/2020 09:30 AM in San Jose, Courtroom 6, 4th Floor. (cv, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/15/2019) |
Filing 4 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Susan van Keulen. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 11/29/2019. (bwS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/14/2019) |
Filing 3 Proposed Summons. (Hewitt, Michael) (Filed on 11/14/2019) |
Filing 2 Certificate of Interested Entities by Cisco Systems, Inc., Cisco Technology, Inc. and Corporate Disclosure Statement (Heaton, Lyndsey) (Filed on 11/14/2019) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Mushkin, Inc., Jeffrey Ramey ( Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0971-13891097.). Filed byCisco Systems, Inc., Cisco Technology, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Heaton, Lyndsey) (Filed on 11/14/2019) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.