Electronic Receipts Delivery Systems, LLC v. Vend Limited
Plaintiff: Electronic Receipts Delivery Systems, LLC
Defendant: Vend Limited
Case Number: 3:2019cv07552
Filed: November 15, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Presiding Judge: Vince Chhabria
Referring Judge: Nathanael M Cousins
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1338
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
RSS RSS Track this Docket
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 13, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 13, 2020 Filing 13 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed filed by Electronic Receipts Delivery Systems, LLC. Service waived by Vend Limited waiver sent on 1/10/2020, answer due 3/10/2020. (Nielsen, Steven) (Filed on 1/13/2020)
November 21, 2019 Filing 12 REASSIGNED CASE - NOTICE OF NEW HEARING DATE: You are notified that the Court has scheduled an Initial Case Management Conference before Judge Vince Chhabria upon reassignment. For a copy of Judge Chhabria's Standing Order and other information, please refer to the Court's website at www.cand.uscourts.gov. Case Management Statement due by 2/5/2020. Initial Case Management Conference set for 2/12/2020 10:00 AM in San Francisco, Courtroom 04, 17th Floor. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.)(knm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/21/2019)
November 20, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned using a proportionate, random, and blind system pursuant to General Order No. 44 to Judge Vince Chhabria for all further proceedings. Notice: The assigned judge participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order No. 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras. Magistrate Judge Nathanael M. Cousins no longer assigned to case, Reassignment Order signed by e Clerk on 11/20/2019. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Eligibility for Video Recording)(bwS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/20/2019)
November 20, 2019 Filing 10 CLERK'S NOTICE OF IMPENDING REASSIGNMENT TO A U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE: The Clerk of this Court will now randomly reassign this case to a District Judge because a party has not consented to the jurisdiction of a Magistrate Judge. You will be informed by separate notice of the district judge to whom this case is reassigned. ALL HEARING DATES PRESENTLY SCHEDULED BEFORE THE CURRENT MAGISTRATE JUDGE ARE VACATED. This is a text only docket entry; there is no document associated with this notice. (lmh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/20/2019)
November 20, 2019 Filing 9 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Electronic Receipts Delivery Systems, LLC.. (Nielsen, Steven) (Filed on 11/20/2019)
November 15, 2019 Filing 8 Summons Issued as to Vend Limited. (sfbS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/15/2019)
November 15, 2019 Filing 7 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Case Management Statement due by 2/12/2020. Initial Case Management Conference set for 2/19/2020 10:00 AM in San Jose, Courtroom 5, 4th Floor. (sfbS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/15/2019)
November 15, 2019 Filing 6 Case assigned to Judge Nathanael M. Cousins. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 11/29/2019. (ajsS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/15/2019)
November 15, 2019 Filing 5 Proposed Summons. (Nielsen, Steven) (Filed on 11/15/2019)
November 15, 2019 Filing 4 REPORT on the filing or determination of an action regarding Patent (cc: form mailed to register). (Nielsen, Steven) (Filed on 11/15/2019)
November 15, 2019 Filing 3 Civil Cover Sheet by ELECTRONIC RECEIPTS DELIVERY SYSTEMS, LLC . (Nielsen, Steven) (Filed on 11/15/2019)
November 15, 2019 Filing 2 Certificate of Interested Entities by ELECTRONIC RECEIPTS DELIVERY SYSTEMS, LLC identifying Corporate Parent Patent Asset Management LLC for ELECTRONIC RECEIPTS DELIVERY SYSTEMS, LLC. (Nielsen, Steven) (Filed on 11/15/2019)
November 15, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Patent Infringement against Vend Limited ( Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0971-13895717.). Filed byELECTRONIC RECEIPTS DELIVERY SYSTEMS, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B)(Nielsen, Steven) (Filed on 11/15/2019)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Electronic Receipts Delivery Systems, LLC v. Vend Limited
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Electronic Receipts Delivery Systems, LLC
Represented By: Steven Anton Nielsen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Vend Limited
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?