Intercast Network, Inc. v. Amplive, Inc.
| INTERCAST NETWORK, INC. |
| AMPLIVE, INC. |
| 3:2019cv07626 |
| November 19, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| William Alsup |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 8, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Intercast Network, Inc. (Wu, Eric) (Filed on 1/8/2020) |
| Filing 11 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Intercast Network, Inc.. Amplive, Inc. served on 12/2/2019, answer due 12/23/2019. (Wu, Eric) (Filed on 12/16/2019) Modified on 12/18/2019 (slhS, COURT STAFF). |
| Filing 10 CLERK'S NOTICE SCHEDULING CMC ON REASSIGNMENT: Case Management Statement due by 2/13/2020. Initial Case Management Conference set for 2/20/2020 11:00 AM in San Francisco, Courtroom 12, 19th Floor. Standing orders can be downloaded from the Court's webpage at www.cand.uscourts.gov/whaorders. All pending motions will be taken off-calendar and must be re-noticed by the moving party for a new hearing date on a Thursday at 08:00 AM. The new hearing date must be at least five weeks from the date the motion was filed and at least three weeks from the date the re-notice is filed. The due date for any opposition or reply papers not yet filed shall be calculated in accordance with Civil Local Rule 7-3. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (tlhS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/6/2019) |
Filing 9
ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned using a proportionate, random, and blind system pursuant to General Order No. 44 to Judge William Alsup for all further proceedings. Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu no longer assigned to case, Notice: The assigned judge participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order No. 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras. Signed by the Clerk on 12/06/2019. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Eligibility for Video Recording)(ajsS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/6/2019)
|
| Filing 8 CLERK'S NOTICE OF IMPENDING REASSIGNMENT TO A U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE: The Clerk of this Court will now randomly reassign this case to a District Judge because either (1) a party has not consented to the jurisdiction of a Magistrate Judge, or (2) time is of the essence in deciding a pending judicial action for which the necessary consents to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction have not been secured. You will be informed by separate notice of the district judge to whom this case is reassigned. ALL HEARING DATES PRESENTLY SCHEDULED BEFORE THE CURRENT MAGISTRATE JUDGE ARE VACATED AND SHOULD BE RE-NOTICED FOR HEARING BEFORE THE JUDGE TO WHOM THIS CASE IS REASSIGNED. This is a text only docket entry; there is no document associated with this notice. (ig, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/5/2019) |
| Filing 7 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Intercast Network, Inc... (Wu, Eric) (Filed on 12/3/2019) |
| Filing 6 ERRATA re #1 Complaint, by Intercast Network, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Wu, Eric) (Filed on 11/26/2019) |
| Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Amplive, Inc. (cjlS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/25/2019) |
| Filing 4 Proposed Summons. (Wu, Eric) (Filed on 11/22/2019) |
| Filing 3 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Case Management Statement due by 2/12/2020. Initial Case Management Conference set for 2/19/2020 01:30 PM in Oakland, Courtroom 4, 3rd Floor. (cjlS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/20/2019) |
| Filing 2 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 12/4/2019. (mbcS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/20/2019) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Breach of Contract (with jury demand) (no process) against AMPLIVE, INC. (Filing fee $400, receipt number 0971-13907079). Filed by INTERCAST NETWORK, INC. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Wu, Eric) (Filed on 11/19/2019) Modified on 11/20/2019 (cjlS, COURT STAFF). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Intercast Network, Inc. v. Amplive, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: AMPLIVE, INC. | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: INTERCAST NETWORK, INC. | |
| Represented By: | Eric J. Wu |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
