Love v. Checkr, Inc.
Plaintiff: Antwan Love
Defendant: Checkr, Inc.
Case Number: 3:2019cv07730
Filed: November 24, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 15:1681
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 24, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 24, 2019 Filing 2 Proposed Summons. (Heath, Erika) (Filed on 11/24/2019)
November 24, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Violations of Fair Credit Reporting Act; Demand for Jury Trial against Defendant Checkr, Inc., (Filing Fee: $400.00, receipt number 0971-13921266). Filed by Antwan Love. (Attachments: #(1) Civil Cover Sheet)(Heath, Erika) (Filed on 11/24/2019)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Love v. Checkr, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Antwan Love
Represented By: Erika Angelos Heath
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Checkr, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?