Haydon v. Monsanto Company
Jon Haydon |
Monsanto Company |
3:2019cv07740 |
November 25, 2019 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
Vince Chhabria |
Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 23, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 13 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Monsanto Company identifying Other Affiliate Bayer AG for Monsanto Company. (Hollingsworth, Joe) (Filed on 1/23/2020) |
Filing 12 Certificate of Interested Entities by Monsanto Company identifying Other Affiliate Bayer AG for Monsanto Company. (Hollingsworth, Joe) (Filed on 1/23/2020) |
Filing 11 ANSWER to Complaint with jury demand byMonsanto Company. (Hollingsworth, Joe) (Filed on 1/23/2020) |
Filing 10 Case transferred in from District of Florida Middle; Case Number 5:19-cv-00409. Original file certified copy of transfer order and docket sheet received. |
MEMBER CASE OPENED: Middle District of Florida (Ocala), 5:19-cv-00409 JSM PRL, Haydon v. Monsanto Company, Opened in California Northern District as 3:19-cv-07740 VC pursuant to Conditional Transfer Order 162 cc: JPMDL (fabS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/25/2019) |
Filing 9 MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION panel order transferring case to: Northern District of California Transferee court case number: (CTO-162) MDL case number: 2741 (LAB) |
Filing 8 RETURN of service executed on 9/30/2019 by Jon Haydon as to Monsanto Company. (Petosa, Frank) |
Filing 7 NOTICE of pendency of related cases re #4 Related case order and track 2 notice per Local Rule 1.04(d) by Jon Haydon. Related case(s): yes (Petosa, Frank) |
Filing 6 CERTIFICATE of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement by Jon Haydon. (Petosa, Frank) |
Filing 5 POSSIBLE MDL Tag Along case for MDL Case Number 2741, In re: Roundup Products Liability Litigation. Information emailed to MDL Panel on 8/29/2019, including cover letter, copy of complaint, and docket sheet. (Attachments: #1 Complaint, #2 Docket sheet) (LAB) |
Filing 4 RELATED CASE ORDER AND NOTICE of designation under Local Rule 3.05 - track 2. Signed by Judge James S. Moody, Jr. on 8/27/2019. (KAC) |
Filing 3 SUMMONS issued as to Monsanto Company. (LAB) |
Filing 2 NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Judge James S. Moody, Jr and Magistrate Judge Philip R. Lammens. New case number: 5:19-cv-409-Oc-30PRL. (SJB) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Monsanto Company with Jury Demand (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 113A-15842111) filed by Jon Haydon. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons)(Petosa, Frank) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Haydon v. Monsanto Company | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Monsanto Company | |
Represented By: | Joe G. Hollingsworth |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Jon Haydon | |
Represented By: | Frank Michael Petosa |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.