Ronay v. Monsanto Company
Emma Ronay |
Monsanto Company |
3:2019cv07930 |
December 5, 2019 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
Vince Chhabria |
Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 20, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 ANSWER to Complaint with jury demand byMonsanto Company. (Hollingsworth, Joe) (Filed on 12/20/2019) |
Filing 7 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Monsanto Company identifying Other Affiliate Bayer AG for Monsanto Company. (Hollingsworth, Joe) (Filed on 12/20/2019) |
Filing 6 Certificate of Interested Entities by Monsanto Company identifying Other Affiliate Bayer AG for Monsanto Company. (Hollingsworth, Joe) (Filed on 12/20/2019) |
Filing 5 Case transferred in from District of Texas Eastern; Case Number 9:19-cv-00199. Original file certified copy of transfer order and docket sheet received. |
MEMBER CASE OPENED: Texas Eastern, 9:19-cv-00199, Ronay v. Monsanto Company, Opened in California Northern District as 3:19-cv-07930-VC pursuant to Conditional Transfer Order 168 cc: JPMDL (fabS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/5/2019) |
Filing 4 Acknowledgment of Conditional Transfer Order Finalized (CTO-168). Received and Signed by MDL Panel Clerk.(ljw, ) |
Interdistrict transfer to the Northern District of California. (ljw, ) |
Filing 3 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Emma Ronay. Monsanto Company served on 11/4/2019, answer due 11/25/2019. (Binstock, Robert) |
Filing 2 SUMMONS Issued as to Monsanto Company and emailed to Attorney in Charge for service. (ljw, ) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Monsanto Company ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0540-7502203.), filed by Emma Ronay. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit Transfer Order, #3 Summons(es))(Binstock, Robert) |
Case assigned to District Judge Ron Clark. (ljw, ) |
CASE REFERRED to Magistrate Judge Zack Hawthorn. (ljw, ) |
DEMAND for Trial by Jury by Emma Ronay. (ljw, ) |
In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form #Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. (ljw, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Ronay v. Monsanto Company | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Emma Ronay | |
Represented By: | Robert Jay Binstock |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Monsanto Company | |
Represented By: | Joe G. Hollingsworth |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.