Bishop v. Juul Labs, Inc. et al
Cody Bishop |
JUUL Labs Inc and Pax Labs Inc |
3:2019cv07961 |
December 4, 2019 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
William H Orrick |
Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 4, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 Case transferred in from District of Ohio Northern; Case Number 3:19-cv-02738. Original file certified copy of transfer order and docket sheet received. |
MEMBER CASE OPENED: Oaklahoma Northern, 3:19-cv-02738-JGC, Bishop v Juul Labs, Inc., et al, Opened in California Northern District as 3:19-cv-7961-WHO pursuant to Conditional Transfer Order 14 cc: JPMDL (aaaS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/4/2019) |
Filing 5 Conditional Transfer Order (CTO 14) by the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation. In re: MDL 2913 Juul Labs, Inc., Marketing, Sales Practices, and Products Liability Litigation. Case transferred to the Northern District of California and assigned to the Honorable William H. Orrick, III.(P,R) |
Filing 4 Original Summons and Magistrate Consent Form issued to counsel for service upon Juul Labs, Inc., PAX Labs, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Magistrate Consent Form) (M,L) |
Notice re Prompt Service. Counsel for Plaintiff is responsible for promptly serving the Complaint on Defendant(s) upon receiving the issued summons from the Clerk and, after service has been perfected, electronically filing a Return of Service or an executed Waiver of Service for each Defendant.Service is to be accomplished pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4, which includes provisions for personal service and waiver of service, and Local Rule 4.2. If you wish the Clerk to serve the Complaint on Defendant(s) (a seldom used alternative because it does not save time or money), you must provide the Clerk's office with copies of the Complaint along with other necessary documents, in the manner set forth in Local Rule 4.2(a). (M,L) |
Filing 3 Supplement to Complaint, - Summons PAX Labs, Inc., filed by Cody Bishop. Related document(s) #1 . (Kranz, Michelle) |
Filing 2 Supplement to Complaint, - Summons Juul Labs Inc., filed by Cody Bishop. Related document(s) #1 . (Kranz, Michelle) |
Filing 1 Complaint with jury demand against Juul Labs, Inc., PAX Labs, Inc.. Filing fee paid $ 400, Receipt number 0647-9640591.. Filed by Cody Bishop. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons Juul Labs, Inc., #3 Summons PAX Labs, Inc.) (Kranz, Michelle) |
Judge James G. Carr assigned to case. (M,L) |
Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge James R. Knepp, II. (M,L) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.