Alvarez v. People of California
Petitioner: Pedro Alvarez
Respondent: People of California
Case Number: 3:2019cv08383
Filed: December 23, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Presiding Judge: Vince Chhabria
Referring Judge: Jacqueline Scott Corley
2 Judge: PSLC RMH
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 18, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 13, 2020 Opinion or Order Copy of re #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus & re #9 Order to Show Cause served by mail upon the Respondent and the Attorney General of the State of California. (tnS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/13/2020)
January 10, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. Signed by Judge Vince Chhabria on 1/10/2020. The deputy clerk hereby certifies that on 1/10/2020 a copy of this order was served by sending it via first-class mail to the address of each non-CM/ECF user listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing. (knm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/10/2020)
January 9, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned using a proportionate, random, and blind system pursuant to General Order No. 44 to Judge Vince Chhabria for all further proceedings. Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley no longer assigned to case, Notice: The assigned judge participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order No. 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras.. Signed by Clerk on 01/09/2020. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Eligibility for Video Recording)(mbcS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/9/2020)
January 8, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 7 CLERK'S NOTICE of Impending Reassignment to U.S. District Judge (ahm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/8/2020)
January 6, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 6 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Pedro Alvarez re #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (slhS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/6/2020)
January 6, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 5 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Pedro Alvarez. (slhS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/6/2020)
January 6, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 4 Letter dated 12/31/19 from Pedro Alvarez. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(slhS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/6/2020)
December 23, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 3 Notice of Assignment of Prisoner Case to Magistrate Judge. (wsnS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/23/2019)
December 23, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Pedro Alvarez. (wsnS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/23/2019)
December 23, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus. Filed by Pedro Alvarez. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits Part 1, #2 Exhibits Part 2, #3 Exhibits Part 3, #4 Envelope) (wsnS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/23/2019)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Alvarez v. People of California
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: People of California
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Pedro Alvarez
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?