Harper v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
| Darla Harper |
| Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. and Wal-Mart |
| 3:2020cv00291 |
| January 13, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Charles R Breyer |
| Labor: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 16, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 2 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Notice: The assigned judge participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order No. 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras. This case may fall within the Pilot Program for Initial Discovery Protocols for Employment Cases Alleging Adverse Action. See #General Order 71. Parties and Counsel are directed to review G eneral Order 71 to determine whether it applies to this case, and to comply with that General Order if applicable. Case Management Statement due by 4/10/2020. Initial Case Management Conference set for 4/17/2020 08:30 AM in San Francisco, Courtroom 06, 17th Floor. (Attachments: #1 Supplement Notice of Eligibility for Video, #2 Standing Order For All Judges)(msrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/16/2020) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.. Filed byDarla Harper. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(msrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/13/2020) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
