Ritter v. JUUL Labs, Inc. et al
| TUCKER RITTER |
| JUUL Labs, Inc., PAX Labs, Inc., Philip Morris USA, Inc. and Altria Group, Inc. |
| 3:2020cv00362 |
| January 16, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| William H Orrick |
| Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 21, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
SUMMONS Returned Executed by Tucker Ritter. Philip Morris USA, Inc. served on 2/19/2020, answer due 3/11/2020. (Jeffcott, Emily) (Filed on 2/27/2020)
|
|
Filing 8
SUMMONS Returned Executed by Tucker Ritter. Juul Labs, Inc. served on 2/17/2020, answer due 3/9/2020. (Jeffcott, Emily) (Filed on 2/27/2020)
|
|
Filing 7
SUMMONS Returned Executed by Tucker Ritter. PAX Labs, Inc. served on 2/14/2020, answer due 3/6/2020. (Jeffcott, Emily) (Filed on 2/27/2020)
|
|
Filing 6
SUMMONS Returned Executed by Tucker Ritter. Altria Group, Inc. served on 2/14/2020, answer due 3/6/2020. (Jeffcott, Emily) (Filed on 2/27/2020)
|
|
Filing 5
Transcript of Proceedings held on February 14, 2020, before Judge William H. Orrick. Court Reporter Belle Ball, CSR, CRR, RDR, telephone number (415)373-2529, belle_ball@cand.uscourts.gov. Per General Order No. 59 and Judicial Conference policy, this transcript may be viewed only at the Clerk's Office public terminal or may be purchased through the Court Reporter until the deadline for the Release of Transcript Restriction. After that date it may be obtained through PACER. Any Notice of Intent to Request Redaction, if required, is due no later than 5 business days from date of this filing. (Re (376 in 3:19-md-02913-WHO) Transcript Order, (375 in 3:19-md-02913-WHO) Transcript Order, (371 in 3:19-md-02913-WHO) Transcript Order, (374 in 3:19-md-02913-WHO) Transcript Order, (373 in 3:19-md-02913-WHO) Transcript Order ) Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 3/20/2020. (ballbb15S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/18/2020)
|
|
Filing 4
Summons Issued as to Altria Group, Inc., JUUL Labs, Inc., PAX Labs, Inc., Philip Morris USA, Inc.. (slhS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/13/2020)
|
|
DIRECT FILED MEMBER CASE OPENED: re 3:19-md-2913 WHO, Tucker Ritter v. JUUL Labs, et al, Opened in California Northern District as 3:20-cv-362 WHO pursuant to Conditional Transfer Order cc: JPMDL (slhS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/13/2020)
|
|
Filing 3
Case assigned to Judge William H. Orrick. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. (ajsS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/16/2020)
|
|
Filing 2
Proposed Summons. (Jeffcott, Emily) (Filed on 1/16/2020)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against Altria Group, Inc., JUUL Labs, Inc., PAX Labs, Inc., Philip Morris USA, Inc. (Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0971-14079064). Filed by Tucker Ritter. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Jeffcott, Emily) (Filed on 1/16/2020) Modified on 2/13/2020 (slhS, COURT STAFF).
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
