Cedar Lane Technologies Inc. v. Zoom Video Communications, Inc.
Cedar Lane Technologies Inc. |
Zoom Video Communications, Inc. |
3:2020cv00552 |
January 24, 2020 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
William H Orrick |
Donna M Ryu |
Patent |
35 U.S.C. § 271 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 9, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 31 REPORT on the determination of an action regarding patent infringement (cc: form mailed to register). (Attachments: #1 Order)(slhS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/9/2020) |
|
Filing 29 NOTICE of Settlement filed by Zoom Video Communications, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Armond, Michelle) (Filed on 3/4/2020) Modified on 3/5/2020 (slhS, COURT STAFF). |
|
|
Filing 26 CLERK'S NOTICE OF IMPENDING REASSIGNMENT TO A U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE: The Clerk of this Court will now randomly reassign this case to a District Judge because either (1) a party has not consented to the jurisdiction of a Magistrate Judge, or (2) time is of the essence in deciding a pending judicial action for which the necessary consents to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction have not been secured. You will be informed by separate notice of the district judge to whom this case is reassigned. ALL HEARING DATES PRESENTLY SCHEDULED BEFORE THE CURRENT MAGISTRATE JUDGE ARE VACATED AND SHOULD BE RE-NOTICED FOR HEARING BEFORE THE JUDGE TO WHOM THIS CASE IS REASSIGNED. This is a text only docket entry; there is no document associated with this notice. (ig, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/27/2020) |
Filing 25 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Zoom Video Communications, Inc... (Armond, Michelle) (Filed on 2/26/2020) |
Filing 24 STIPULATION to Extend Time to Respond to Complaint filed by Zoom Video Communications, Inc. and Cedar Lane Technologies Inc. (Armond, Michelle) (Filed on 2/24/2020) Modified on 2/25/2020 (jmlS, COURT STAFF). |
Filing 23 NOTICE of Appearance by Michelle Elle Armond (Armond, Michelle) (Filed on 2/24/2020) |
Filing 22 SECOND CLERK'S NOTICE TO PLAINTIFF AND DEFENDANT Re: Consent or Declination: Plaintiff and Defendant shall file a consent or declination to proceed before a magistrate judge. Note that any party is free to withhold consent to proceed before a magistrate judge without adverse substantive consequences. The forms are available at: http://cand.uscourts.gov/civilforms. Consent/Declination due by 2/26/2020. (ig, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/12/2020) |
Filing 21 CLERK'S NOTICE Re: Consent or Declination: Plaintiff and Defendant shall file a consent or declination to proceed before a magistrate judge. Note that any party is free to withhold consent to proceed before a magistrate judge without adverse substantive consequences. The forms are available at: http://cand.uscourts.gov/civilforms. Consent/Declination due by 2/11/2020. (ig, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/28/2020) |
Filing 20 REPORT on the filing of an action regarding Patent (cc: form mailed to register). (Attachments: #1 Complaint, #2 Transfer Order)(cjlS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/24/2020) |
Filing 19 CLERK'S NOTICE Acknowledging Receipt of Case Transfer in from the District of Colorado, 1:19-cv-3340-DDD-NYW. (cjlS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/24/2020) |
Filing 18 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Case Management Statement due by 4/29/2020. Initial Case Management Conference set for 5/6/2020 01:30 PM in Oakland, Courtroom 4, 3rd Floor. (cjlS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/24/2020) |
Filing 17 Case transferred in from District of Colorado; Case Number 1:19-cv-03340. Case file, copy of transfer order and docket sheet received. Modified on 1/24/2020 (cjlS, COURT STAFF). |
|
Filing 15 Joint MOTION to Transfer Case to the Northern District of California and Stay All Deadlines by Defendant Zoom Video Communications, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order (PDF Only))(Lucas, John) |
Filing 14 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Thomas Lee Duston on behalf of Zoom Video Communications, Inc.Attorney Thomas Lee Duston added to party Zoom Video Communications, Inc.(pty:dft) (Duston, Thomas) |
|
Filing 12 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer or Otherwise Respond re #1 Complaint, by Defendant Zoom Video Communications, Inc.. (Lucas, John) |
Filing 11 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by John Joseph Lucas on behalf of Zoom Video Communications, Inc.Attorney John Joseph Lucas added to party Zoom Video Communications, Inc.(pty:dft) (Lucas, John) |
|
|
Filing 8 SUMMONS issued by Clerk. (Attachments: #1 Magistrate Judge Consent Form) (cmadr, ) |
Filing 7 Case assigned to Judge Daniel D. Domenico and drawn to Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang. Text Only Entry (cmadr, ) |
Filing 6 Report re Patent/Trademark: Report on the filing of an action emailed (NEF) to the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (cmadr, ) |
Filing 5 Filing fee: $ 400.00, receipt number COX092966 (cmadr, ) |
Filing 4 Administrative Notice: No filing fee received with case opening. Attorney contacted with instructions to submit filing fee within 3 hours. (Text Only Entry) (alave, ) |
Filing 3 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. (Rabicoff, Isaac) |
Filing 2 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Isaac Philip Rabicoff on behalf of Cedar Lane Technologies Inc. (Rabicoff, Isaac) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Zoom Video Communications, Inc. (Filing fee $ 400).Attorney Isaac Philip Rabicoff added to party Cedar Lane Technologies Inc.(pty:pla), filed by Cedar Lane Technologies Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Civil Cover Sheet, #4 Summons)(Rabicoff, Isaac) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Cedar Lane Technologies Inc. v. Zoom Video Communications, Inc. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Cedar Lane Technologies Inc. | |
Represented By: | Isaac Philip Rabicoff |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Zoom Video Communications, Inc. | |
Represented By: | John Joseph Lucas |
Represented By: | Thomas Lee Duston |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.